Michelon Pascale, Zacks Jeffrey M
Department of Psychology, Washington University, Campus Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.
Psychol Res. 2003 May;67(2):71-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0124-3. Epub 2002 Dec 3.
Priming from imagery is typically weaker than that from perception. This has been interpreted as resulting from weaker activation of perceptual processes. However, for imagery and perception, commonality is only half the story: Each is also characterized by specific processes. If priming can be due to both unshared and shared components of imagery and perception, then it should be possible to observe greater priming from imagery than from perception. Two new priming experiments were designed to test this hypothesis, while controlling incidental task differences. In both experiments, participants studied objects by counting their parts (from a mental image or a picture). Experiment 1 used a word-picture matching test task, which was hypothesized to depend on stimulus processing specific to perception, and Experiment 2 a size judgment test task, which was hypothesized to depend on retrieval and generation processes specific to imagery. As predicted, priming for perceived objects was greater than priming for imagined objects in the word-picture matching task. Conversely, in the size judgment task, more priming from imagery than from perception was observed. These results support the conclusions that (a) imagery and perception have substantial unshared processes, and (b) these processes contribute to priming.
来自意象的启动效应通常比来自知觉的启动效应弱。这被解释为是由于知觉过程的激活较弱所致。然而,对于意象和知觉来说,共性只是其中一半:每一种还都有其特定的过程。如果启动效应既可以归因于意象和知觉的非共享成分,也可以归因于共享成分,那么应该有可能观察到来自意象的启动效应比来自知觉的启动效应更强。设计了两个新的启动效应实验来检验这一假设,同时控制附带任务的差异。在这两个实验中,参与者通过数物体的部分(从心理意象或图片中)来研究物体。实验1使用了一个单词-图片匹配测试任务,该任务被假设依赖于特定于知觉的刺激处理,实验2使用了一个大小判断测试任务,该任务被假设依赖于特定于意象的检索和生成过程。正如预测的那样,在单词-图片匹配任务中,对知觉物体的启动效应大于对想象物体的启动效应。相反,在大小判断任务中,观察到来自意象的启动效应比来自知觉的启动效应更多。这些结果支持了以下结论:(a)意象和知觉有大量非共享的过程,(b)这些过程对启动效应有贡献。