洛哌丁胺-西甲硅油与单用洛哌丁胺、单用西甲硅油及安慰剂治疗伴有气体相关腹部不适的急性腹泻:一项随机对照试验
Loperamide-simethicone vs loperamide alone, simethicone alone, and placebo in the treatment of acute diarrhea with gas-related abdominal discomfort. A randomized controlled trial.
作者信息
Kaplan M A, Prior M J, Ash R R, McKonly K I, Helzner E C, Nelson E B
机构信息
Medical Department, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Fort Washington, Pa., USA.
出版信息
Arch Fam Med. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):243-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.3.243.
CONTEXT
Acute diarrhea with gas-related abdominal discomfort is a common, usually self-limited disorder with substantial social and economic impact.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and safety of a loperamide hydrochloride-simethicone combination product with those of loperamide alone, simethicone alone, and placebo in treating acute diarrhea with gas-related abdominal discomfort.
DESIGN
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of 48 hours' duration.
SETTING
A primary care, ambulatory practice in Acapulco, Mexico.
PATIENTS
A total of 493 outpatient adults aged 18 to 63 years, with acute nonspecific diarrhea with at least moderately severe abdominal discomfort.
INTERVENTIONS
Each patient was randomly assigned to receive 2 chewable tablets containing loperamide hydrochloride, 2 mg, and simethicone, 125 mg (n = 124); loperamide hydrochloride, 2 mg (n = 123); simethicone, 125 mg (n = 123); or placebo (n = 123). This was followed by 1 tablet after each unformed stool, up to 4 tablets in any 24-hour period.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Time to last unformed stool and time to complete relief of gas-related abdominal discomfort were the protocol-specified primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included time to complete relief of diarrhea, number of unformed stools, and patient-assessed variables at the end of the study (overall illness relief, diarrhea relief, and abdominal discomfort relief).
RESULTS
Patients who received loperamide-simethicone had significantly (P < .001) shorter time to last unformed stool and faster relief of gas-related abdominal discomfort than patients who received loperamide, simethicone, or placebo alone. Loperamide-simethicone was significantly (P < or = .01) more effective than the other 3 treatments for all end-of-study patient-assessed outcomes and all clinically important secondary outcomes. No significant differences in adverse events were found among treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The loperamide-simethicone combination chewable product provides faster and more complete relief of acute nonspecific diarrhea and associated gas-related abdominal discomfort (gas pain, cramps, gas pressure, and bloating) than either of its components or placebo. The combination is well tolerated.
背景
伴有与气体相关的腹部不适的急性腹泻是一种常见的、通常为自限性的疾病,具有重大的社会和经济影响。
目的
比较盐酸洛哌丁胺 - 西甲硅油复方制剂与单独使用盐酸洛哌丁胺、单独使用西甲硅油及安慰剂治疗伴有与气体相关的腹部不适的急性腹泻的疗效和安全性。
设计
为期48小时的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验。
地点
墨西哥阿卡普尔科的一家初级保健门诊机构。
患者
共493名年龄在18至63岁的门诊成年患者,患有急性非特异性腹泻且伴有至少中度严重的腹部不适。
干预措施
每位患者随机分配接受2片含2毫克盐酸洛哌丁胺和125毫克西甲硅油的咀嚼片(n = 124);2毫克盐酸洛哌丁胺(n = 123);125毫克西甲硅油(n = 123);或安慰剂(n = 123)。此后,每次不成形大便后服用1片,任何24小时内最多服用4片。
主要观察指标
最后一次不成形大便的时间和与气体相关的腹部不适完全缓解的时间是方案规定的主要结局指标。次要结局指标包括腹泻完全缓解的时间、不成形大便的次数以及研究结束时患者评估的变量(总体病情缓解、腹泻缓解和腹部不适缓解)。
结果
与单独接受盐酸洛哌丁胺、西甲硅油或安慰剂的患者相比,接受洛哌丁胺 - 西甲硅油的患者最后一次不成形大便的时间显著缩短(P < .001),与气体相关的腹部不适缓解更快。对于所有研究结束时患者评估的结局指标和所有具有临床意义的次要结局指标,洛哌丁胺 - 西甲硅油比其他3种治疗方法显著更有效(P ≤ .01)。各治疗组之间不良事件无显著差异。
结论
与单独使用其任何一种成分或安慰剂相比,盐酸洛哌丁胺 - 西甲硅油复方咀嚼片能更快、更完全地缓解急性非特异性腹泻及相关的与气体相关的腹部不适(气痛、痉挛、气体压迫和腹胀)。该复方制剂耐受性良好。