Leinonen K, Liukkonen K, Poutanen K, Uusitupa M, Mykkänen H
Department of Clinical Nutrition, University of Kuopio, Finland.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;53(4):262-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600716.
To compare if postprandial glucose and insulin responses to wholekernel rye bread are lower than to wheat bread, and to see if these responses to two types of rye breads are different. To explore starch digestion in more detail, rate of starch hydrolysis of same breads was measured in vitro.
Subjects were given test breads (43-61 g available carbohydrates by analysis) with standardized breakfast in a random order after a fast. Eight postprandial blood samples were collected during the following three hours. Rate of starch hydrolysis was determined by an in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis method.
10 men and 10 women, aged 32+/-3 and 27+/-5 y, BMI 24.5+/-2.2 and 20.3+/-1.1 kg/m2, respectively, all had normal glucose tolerance.
Plasma insulin response to wholekernel rye bread was lower than to wheat bread (45 min P = 0.025, 60 min P = 0.002, 90 min P = 0.0004, 120 min P = 0.050, 150 min P = 0.033), but there was no difference in glucose responses. In comparison of two types of rye breads, glucose response to wholemeal rye bread at 150 and 180 min was higher (P = 0.018 and P = 0.041, respectively) and insulin response at 60 min was lower (P = 0.025) than those to wholemeal rye crispbread. Total sugar profiles in vitro were similar for all breads. When free reducing sugars were subtracted, starch in wholekernel and wholemeal rye breads appeared to be hydrolysed slower than starch in wholemeal rye crispbread and wheat bread.
Wholekernel rye bread produces lower postprandial insulin response than wheat bread, but there is no difference in glucose response. The latter is in accordance with in vitro results. Postprandial glucose and insulin may also be affected by type of rye bread. Characteristics of different types of rye breads must be further investigated to develop health properties of rye breads.
比较餐后血糖和胰岛素对全麦黑麦面包的反应是否低于对小麦面包的反应,并观察对两种黑麦面包的反应是否存在差异。为更详细地探究淀粉消化情况,采用体外法测定相同面包的淀粉水解速率。
受试者在禁食后,以随机顺序食用测试面包(经分析可得碳水化合物43 - 61克)并搭配标准化早餐。在随后的三小时内采集8份餐后血样。通过体外酶促水解法测定淀粉水解速率。
10名男性和10名女性,年龄分别为32±3岁和27±5岁,体重指数分别为24.5±2.2和20.3±1.1千克/平方米,所有人糖耐量均正常。
血浆胰岛素对全麦黑麦面包的反应低于对小麦面包的反应(45分钟时P = 0.025,60分钟时P = 0.002,90分钟时P = 0.0004,120分钟时P = 0.050,150分钟时P = 0.033),但血糖反应无差异。比较两种黑麦面包时,全麦黑麦面包在150和180分钟时的血糖反应较高(分别为P = 0.018和P = 0.041),60分钟时的胰岛素反应较低(P = 0.025),均低于全麦黑麦脆饼。所有面包的体外总糖谱相似。扣除游离还原糖后,全麦和全麦黑麦面包中的淀粉水解似乎比全麦黑麦脆饼和小麦面包中的淀粉水解更慢。
全麦黑麦面包产生的餐后胰岛素反应低于小麦面包,但血糖反应无差异。后者与体外结果一致。餐后血糖和胰岛素也可能受黑麦面包类型的影响。必须进一步研究不同类型黑麦面包的特性,以开发黑麦面包的健康特性。