• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Edwards S J, Braunholtz D A, Lilford R J, Stevens A J

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT.

出版信息

BMJ. 1999 May 22;318(7195):1407-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1407.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1407
PMID:10334756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1115783/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.整群随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题
BMJ. 1999 May 22;318(7195):1407-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1407.
2
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题。
Health Technol Assess. 1998 Dec;2(15):i-vi, 1-132.
3
Are distinctive ethical principles required for cluster randomized controlled trials?整群随机对照试验是否需要独特的伦理原则？
Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):473-88. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<473::aid-sim805>3.0.co;2-d.
4
Placebo-controlled trials.安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 3;135(1):63-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-1-200107030-00023.
5
Placebo controls: scientific and ethical issues.安慰剂对照：科学与伦理问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Spring;2(2):33-4. doi: 10.1162/152651602317533668.
6
Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials.整群随机试验设计与分析中的当前及未来挑战
Stat Med. 2001 Dec 30;20(24):3729-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.1115.
7
Ethical issues in placebo-controlled trials in Alzheimer disease.阿尔茨海默病安慰剂对照试验中的伦理问题。
Med J Aust. 2001 Jan 15;174(2):104-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143168.x.
8
The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.在临床试验设计中保持均衡伦理原则的重要性：方法学质量领域对随机对照试验治疗效果的相对影响
Account Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;10(4):301-15. doi: 10.1080/714906103.
9
Prerandomization of clinical trials: a more ethical way for performing cleft palate research.临床试验的预随机化：腭裂研究的一种更具伦理的方式。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Oct;102(5):1724-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00065.
10
For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial.支持与反对：临床 equipoise（平衡）而非不确定性原理才是随机对照试验的道德基础。 注：这里equipoise可结合医学语境准确理解其含义。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):756-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.756.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of cluster randomised crossover trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration.整群随机交叉试验的报告：CONSORT 2010声明的扩展及解释与详述
BMJ. 2025 Jan 6;388:e080472. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080472.
2
Effectiveness of Aerobic Training for Adverse Symptoms Related to Chemotherapy During Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Cost-Effectiveness Assessment.有氧运动对化疗相关不良反应的疗效：一项随机对照试验的方案，包括成本效益评估。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 20;13:e60828. doi: 10.2196/60828.
3
ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece through educational and behavioral interventions among maternity care providers regarding labor management: the ENGAGE stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial protocol.通过针对分娩管理的产妇保健提供者的教育和行为干预来增强希腊的阴道分娩：ENGAGE 逐步楔形随机前瞻性试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08263-x.
4
Ethical Issues in Implementation Science: A Qualitative Interview Study of Participating Clinicians.实施科学中的伦理问题：对参与临床医生的定性访谈研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-31. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2388537. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
Is equipoise a useful concept to justify randomised controlled trials in the cultural context of Pakistan? A survey of clinicians in relation to a trial of talking therapy for young people who self-harm.均衡状态是一个有用的概念，可以为在巴基斯坦文化背景下进行的随机对照试验提供正当理由吗？一项针对与年轻人自伤的谈话治疗试验相关的临床医生的调查。
Trials. 2023 Aug 8;24(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07397-8.
6
PTPRZ1-METFUsion GENe (ZM-FUGEN) trial: study protocol for a multicentric, randomized, open-label phase II/III trial.PTPRZ1-METFU融合基因（ZM-FUGEN）试验：一项多中心、随机、开放标签的II/III期试验研究方案。
Chin Neurosurg J. 2023 Jul 14;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41016-023-00329-0.
7
Effectiveness of a game-based educational strategy e-EDUCAGUIA for implementing antimicrobial clinical practice guidelines in family medicine residents in Spain: a randomized clinical trial by cluster.基于游戏的教育策略 e-EDUCAGUIA 在西班牙家庭医学住院医师中实施抗菌药物临床实践指南的效果：一项以群组为单位的随机临床试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Dec 24;22(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03843-4.
8
Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.赋权地方研究伦理审查机构对抗菌药物集体用药研究进行审查。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Sep 28;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01031-6.
9
Systematic Review of the "Pragmatism" of Pragmatic Critical Care Trials.实用主义重症监护试验的“实用主义”系统评价
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jul 22;4(7):e0738. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000738. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
The challenges of keeping clinicians unaware of their participation in a national, cluster-randomised, implementation trial.使临床医生不知道他们参与了一项全国性、整群随机、实施试验的挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 May 30;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00794-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题。
Health Technol Assess. 1998 Dec;2(15):i-vi, 1-132.
2
Implications of socio-cultural contexts for the ethics of clinical trials.社会文化背景对临床试验伦理的影响。
Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(9):i-iv, 1-65.
3
Independent ethical review of studies involving personal medical records. Report of a working group to the Royal College of Physicians Committee on Ethical Issues in Medicine.涉及个人病历研究的独立伦理审查。医学伦理问题皇家内科医学院委员会工作组报告。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Sep-Oct;28(5):439-43.
4
Community-based intervention trials.基于社区的干预试验。
J Biosoc Sci Suppl. 1989;10:79-86. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000025281.