For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial.
作者信息
Weijer C, Shapiro S H, Cranley Glass K
机构信息
Department of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4H7, Canada.
出版信息
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):756-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.756.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial.
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):756-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.756.
2
Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. Clinical equipoise and the uncertainty principles both require further scrutiny.
BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):795.
3
Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. There is another exchange on equipoise and uncertainty.
BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):795-6.
4
Pulling the plug on clinical equipoise: a critique of Miller and Weijer.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2007 Sep;17(3):203-26; discussion 227-46. doi: 10.1353/ken.2007.0020.
5
How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):691-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410912.
6
The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
Account Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;10(4):301-15. doi: 10.1080/714906103.
7
Rehabilitating equipoise.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2003 Jun;13(2):93-118. doi: 10.1353/ken.2003.0014.
8
Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials.
J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):401-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.401.
9
Therapeutic beneficence and patient recruitment in randomized controlled clinical trials.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Spring;2(2):35-6. doi: 10.1162/152651602317533677.
10
Evidence, belief, and action: the failure of equipoise to resolve the ethical tension in the randomized clinical trial.
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3):375-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00406.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Practical and statistical aspects of subgroup analyses in surgical neuro-oncology: A comprehensive review from the PIONEER consortium.
Neuro Oncol. 2025 Jun 21;27(5):1149-1164. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae261.
2
The death of a neurotrauma trial lessons learned from the prematurely halted randomized evaluation of surgery in elderly with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (RESET-ASDH) trial.
Brain Spine. 2024 Jul 18;4:102903. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102903. eCollection 2024.
3
CREST-2 Reaches A Surgical Milestone.
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;79(2):195-197.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.045. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
4
Trials Methodology Research: what is it and why should India invest in it?
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Feb 2;22:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100360. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Integrating Systematic Reviews into Supportive Care Trial Design: The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program.
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;29(12):9550-9559. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120750.
6
Recruiting to surgical trials in the emergency setting: using a mixed methods study to understand clinician and patient perspectives.
BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac137.
7
Randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Aug 26;13:379. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1032_2021. eCollection 2022.
8
The Randomised Controlled Trial at the Intersection of Research Ethics and Innovation.
Pharmaceut Med. 2022 Oct;36(5):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00438-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
9
Genetically-Guided Medical Nutrition Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-diabetes: A Series of -of-1 Superiority Trials.
Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 21;9:772243. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.772243. eCollection 2022.
10
Review of Clinical Equipoise: Examples from Oncology Trials.
Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2023;18(1):22-30. doi: 10.2174/2772432817666211221164101.
本文引用的文献
1
2
Why should we include women and minorities in randomized controlled trials?
J Clin Ethics. 1999 Summer;10(2):100-6.
3
Placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia: are they ethical? Are they necessary?
Schizophr Res. 1999 Feb 15;35(3):211-8; discussion 227-36. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(98)00127-3.
4
Using anecdotal information in evidence-based health care: heresy or necessity?
Ann Oncol. 1998 Sep;9(9):963-6. doi: 10.1023/A:1008495101125.
5
Trials: the next 50 years. Large scale randomised evidence of moderate benefits.
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1170-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1170.
6
A study in contrasts: eligibility criteria in a twenty-year sample of NSABP and POG clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Program. Pediatric Oncology Group.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;51(2):69-79. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00240-0.
7
Bloodletting in American obstetric practice, 1800-1945.
Bull Hist Med. 1980 Spring;54(1):101-10.
8
Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 1984 May 24;310(21):1363-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198405243102106.
9
Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?
Stat Med. 1984 Oct-Dec;3(4):409-22. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030421.
10
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials.
J Chronic Dis. 1967 Aug;20(8):637-48. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0.
Zotero 插件