Tulen J H, Boomsma F, Man in 't Veld A J
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt and Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Sci (Lond). 1999 Jun;96(6):567-76.
In order to understand the complex autonomic adjustments that occur during the psychological challenges of normal daily life, autonomic responses to psychological stress were studied by evaluating the effects of body posture on various indices of sympathetic and parasympathetic regulation during performance of a psychological task. Twelve male subjects were studied in various postures (supine, sitting and standing), and during performance of the Colour Word Test (CWT) when sitting and then when standing. This procedure was subsequently repeated in reverse order (first standing and then sitting) after 15 min of supine rest. Blood samples for assay of plasma catecholamines were obtained before and during each CWT. Spectral analysis of beat-to-beat variations of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) was applied in order to obtain non-invasive indices of sympathetic and parasympathetic regulation. HR, diastolic BP, mid-frequency band power (0.07-0.14 Hz) of HR and systolic BP, and plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations showed significant increases when changing from supine to sitting to standing posture, whereas high-frequency band power (0.15-0.50 Hz) of HR decreased in a posture-dependent fashion. In the sitting position, the CWT caused significant increases in HR, BP and plasma adrenaline levels, and decreased HR and BP variability indices. In the standing posture, the CWT responses differed significantly from those during sitting for HR (a mild decrease during standing), high-frequency band power of HR (decreased more while sitting), high-frequency band power of BP (decreased more while standing), and plasma adrenaline responses (larger during sitting). Posture-related differential effects were observed on indices of sympatho-adrenomedullary activation during performance of a psychological challenge, whereas indices of parasympathetic activity indicated primarily less vagolytic effects when the task was performed in the standing posture. Our findings therefore underline the complexity of the adjustments that occur in neurohumoral and haemodynamic parameters during the psychological challenges of daily life.
为了理解在正常日常生活的心理挑战过程中发生的复杂自主神经调节,通过评估在执行心理任务期间身体姿势对交感神经和副交感神经调节的各种指标的影响,研究了对心理应激的自主神经反应。对12名男性受试者在不同姿势(仰卧、坐姿和站姿)下进行研究,并且在执行颜色词测试(CWT)期间,先坐姿后站姿。在仰卧休息15分钟后,按相反顺序(先站姿后坐姿)重复此过程。在每次CWT之前和期间采集血样以测定血浆儿茶酚胺。应用心率(HR)和血压(BP)逐搏变化的频谱分析以获得交感神经和副交感神经调节的非侵入性指标。当从仰卧姿势变为坐姿再变为站姿时,HR、舒张压、HR的中频带功率(0.07 - 0.14Hz)和收缩压以及血浆肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素浓度显著增加,而HR的高频带功率(0.15 - 0.50Hz)以姿势依赖的方式降低。在坐姿时,CWT导致HR、BP和血浆肾上腺素水平显著增加,并降低HR和BP变异性指标。在站姿时,CWT对HR(站立时轻度下降)、HR的高频带功率(坐姿时下降更多)、BP的高频带功率(站立时下降更多)和血浆肾上腺素反应(坐姿时更大)的反应与坐姿时显著不同。在执行心理挑战期间,观察到姿势相关的对交感 - 肾上腺髓质激活指标的差异效应,而副交感神经活动指标表明当任务以站姿执行时主要是较少的迷走神经抑制作用。因此,我们的研究结果强调了在日常生活的心理挑战期间神经体液和血液动力学参数中发生的调节的复杂性。