Suppr超能文献

坐位时颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度作为中心动脉僵硬度指标的有效性。

The validity of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in the seated posture as an index of central arterial stiffness.

作者信息

Karaki Marino, Kunimatsu Narumi, Watanabe Kohei, Tomoto Tsubasa, Fukuie Marina, Sugawara Jun, Ogoh Shigehiko

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Saitama, Japan.

School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2025 Feb 1;328(2):R145-R153. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00073.2024. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

A previous study reported an increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) during an upright posture compared to the supine position, partly due to sympathetic activation. However, given that cfPWV is influenced by the transmural pressure (TMP) of the artery, which is elevated in the abdominal aorta in the seated posture due to the increased hydrostatic pressure. Thus, it remains unclear whether this increased cfPWV reflects a true rise in arterial stiffness or is simply a result of the elevated TMP. To assess the validity of cfPWV in the seated posture for arterial stiffness assessment, 20 young healthy subjects underwent arterial stiffness measurements in both the supine and seated positions. There were no significant differences in carotid artery compliance, β-stiffness index, and aortic characteristic impedance between the two positions ( = 0.209-0.380). However, cfPWV was higher in the seated posture than the supine posture (5.4 ± 0.6 vs. 6.2 ± 0.8 m/s, < 0.0001), showing a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between positions ( = 0.841, < 0.0001) and a parallel upward shift by 14% ( = 1.01 + 0.54). Moreover, cfPWV was correlated with TMP at the groin level ( = 0.532, = 0.0004), and after adjusting for TMP at the groin level using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), the posture-related difference in cfPWV was no longer significant ( = 0.867). These findings suggest that the increase in cfPWV observed in the seated posture is primarily due to elevated TMP caused by increased hydrostatic pressure, rather than a genuine rise in arterial stiffness. Consequently, cfPWV measurements taken in the seated posture may overestimate arterial stiffness unless they are appropriately adjusted for TMP. This study demonstrated for the first time that the increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) observed in the seated posture is likely due to elevated transmural pressure (TMP) caused by increased hydrostatic pressure, rather than an actual rise in central arterial stiffness. Intraclass correlation analysis also showed a parallel upward shift in the regression line between supine and seated postures. This suggests that cfPWV values obtained in the seated position should be adjusted for hydrostatic pressure and TMP.

摘要

先前的一项研究报告称,与仰卧位相比,直立位时颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)增加,部分原因是交感神经激活。然而,鉴于cfPWV受动脉跨壁压(TMP)影响,在坐姿时腹主动脉的TMP因静水压力增加而升高。因此,尚不清楚这种cfPWV增加是反映动脉僵硬度的真正升高还是仅仅是TMP升高的结果。为了评估坐姿下cfPWV用于评估动脉僵硬度的有效性,20名年轻健康受试者在仰卧位和坐姿下均接受了动脉僵硬度测量。两个体位之间的颈动脉顺应性、β僵硬度指数和主动脉特征阻抗无显著差异(P = 0.209 - 0.380)。然而,坐姿时的cfPWV高于仰卧位(5.4 ± 0.6 vs. 6.2 ± 0.8 m/s,P < 0.0001),体位间显示出较高的组内相关系数(ICC)(P = 0.841,P < 0.0001)且呈平行向上偏移14%(P = 1.01 + 0.54)。此外,cfPWV与腹股沟水平的TMP相关(P = 0.532,P = 0.0004),并且在使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)对腹股沟水平的TMP进行校正后,cfPWV与体位相关的差异不再显著(P = 0.867)。这些发现表明,坐姿时观察到的cfPWV增加主要是由于静水压力增加导致TMP升高,而非动脉僵硬度真正升高。因此,除非对TMP进行适当校正,否则坐姿下进行的cfPWV测量可能会高估动脉僵硬度。本研究首次证明,坐姿时观察到的颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)增加可能是由于静水压力增加导致跨壁压(TMP)升高,而非中心动脉僵硬度实际升高。组内相关分析还显示仰卧位和坐姿之间的回归线呈平行向上偏移。这表明坐姿下获得的cfPWV值应针对静水压力和TMP进行校正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验