Kellerhals B
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1976;38(4):193-7. doi: 10.1159/000275275.
The problem of the perilymph origin--influx of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) versus ultrafiltration within the cochlea--cannot be solved by mere qualitative proofs of tracer passage through the cochlear aqueduct. In order to gain quantitative data on the possible perilymph sources, an experimental study was designed to follow the time course of dye concentrations in the cisternal CSF and in the perilymph after tracer injection into the CSF at the vertex. By comparing the resulting concentration peaks in both fluids, the mean peak of the perilymph tracer concentrations was found to reach 36% of the maximum CSF concentration only. It is concluded that the local perilymph production within the cochlea exceeds the influx of CSF by a ratio of about 2:1. A working hypothesis of the double perilymph origin is discussed.
外淋巴的起源问题——脑脊液(CSF)流入与耳蜗内超滤作用——无法仅通过示踪剂通过蜗水管的定性证据来解决。为了获得关于可能的外淋巴来源的定量数据,设计了一项实验研究,以追踪在颅顶将示踪剂注入脑脊液后,脑池内脑脊液和外淋巴中染料浓度随时间的变化过程。通过比较两种液体中产生的浓度峰值,发现外淋巴示踪剂浓度的平均峰值仅达到脑脊液最大浓度的36%。得出的结论是,耳蜗内局部外淋巴生成量超过脑脊液流入量,比例约为2:1。文中讨论了外淋巴双重起源的一个可行假说。