Mooi F R, He Q, van Oirschot H, Mertsola J
Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Infect Immun. 1999 Jun;67(6):3133-4. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.6.3133-3134.1999.
There is evidence that pertussis is reemerging in vaccinated populations. We have proposed, and provided evidence for, one explanation for this phenomenon in The Netherlands: antigenic divergence between vaccine strains and circulating strains. Finland has a pertussis vaccination history very similar to that of The Netherlands, and yet there is no evidence for an increase in the incidence of pertussis to the extent that it was observed in The Netherlands. A comparison of the Bordetella pertussis strains circulating in the two countries may shed light on the differences in pertussis epidemiology. Here we investigated whether temporal changes had occurred in pertussis toxin and pertactin types produced by the Finnish B. pertussis population. We show that strains isolated before 1964 produced the same pertussis toxin and pertactin variants as the vaccine strains. However, these vaccine types were replaced in later years, and in the 1990s most strains were distinct from the vaccine strains with respect to the two proteins. These trends are similar to those found in the Dutch B. pertussis population. An interesting difference between the contemporary Finnish and Dutch B. pertussis populations was found in the frequencies of pertactin variants, possibly explaining the distinct epidemiology of pertussis in the two countries.
有证据表明百日咳正在接种疫苗的人群中再度出现。我们已经提出并提供了关于荷兰这一现象的一种解释的证据:疫苗株与流行株之间的抗原性差异。芬兰的百日咳疫苗接种历史与荷兰非常相似,然而,没有证据表明百日咳发病率像在荷兰那样有所增加。比较两国流行的百日咳博德特氏菌菌株可能有助于揭示百日咳流行病学的差异。在此,我们调查了芬兰百日咳博德特氏菌群体产生的百日咳毒素和丝状血凝素类型是否发生了随时间的变化。我们发现,1964年以前分离出的菌株产生的百日咳毒素和丝状血凝素变体与疫苗株相同。然而,这些疫苗类型在随后几年被取代,到了20世纪90年代,就这两种蛋白质而言,大多数菌株与疫苗株不同。这些趋势与在荷兰百日咳博德特氏菌群体中发现的趋势相似。当代芬兰和荷兰百日咳博德特氏菌群体之间一个有趣的差异在于丝状血凝素变体的频率,这可能解释了两国百日咳不同的流行病学情况。