Suppr超能文献

结果研究中的评估方法。

Methods of evaluation in outcomes research.

作者信息

Reed P J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacoeconomics, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis 38163, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 1998 Nov;4(11):1616-25; quiz 1626-7.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This activity is designed for pharmacists, physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare team members; payers for health services; and healthcare executives.

GOAL

To provide basic information on the methods used and computer software available for evaluating invariant factorial structures, such as those found in health status measurement tools.

OBJECTIVES

  1. Discuss why comparison of mean scores may not be appropriate when interpreting humanistic outcomes results. 2. Identify alternative methods for evaluating data from health status measurement tools, such as the SF-36. 3. Define validity, reliability, and structure. 4. Understand the value of structural equation modeling when using health status measurement tools, such as the SF-36. 5. Describe the statistical software used to perform structural equation modeling.
摘要

未标注

本活动面向药剂师、医生、医师助理、护士及其他医疗团队成员、健康服务支付方以及医疗行业管理人员。

目标

提供有关用于评估不变因子结构的方法及可用计算机软件的基本信息,例如在健康状况测量工具中发现的那些结构。

目标

  1. 讨论在解释人文结果时,平均得分比较为何可能不合适。2. 确定评估健康状况测量工具(如SF - 36)数据的替代方法。3. 定义效度、信度和结构。4. 理解在使用健康状况测量工具(如SF - 36)时结构方程模型的价值。5. 描述用于执行结构方程模型的统计软件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验