Socolow R H
Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):6001-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6001.
The food system dominates anthropogenic disruption of the nitrogen cycle by generating excess fixed nitrogen. Excess fixed nitrogen, in various guises, augments the greenhouse effect, diminishes stratospheric ozone, promotes smog, contaminates drinking water, acidifies rain, eutrophies bays and estuaries, and stresses ecosystems. Yet, to date, regulatory efforts to limit these disruptions largely ignore the food system. There are many parallels between food and energy. Food is to nitrogen as energy is to carbon. Nitrogen fertilizer is analogous to fossil fuel. Organic agriculture and agricultural biotechnology play roles analogous to renewable energy and nuclear power in political discourse. Nutrition research resembles energy end-use analysis. Meat is the electricity of food. As the agriculture and food system evolves to contain its impacts on the nitrogen cycle, several lessons can be extracted from energy and carbon: (i) set the goal of ecosystem stabilization; (ii) search the entire production and consumption system (grain, livestock, food distribution, and diet) for opportunities to improve efficiency; (iii) implement cap-and-trade systems for fixed nitrogen; (iv) expand research at the intersection of agriculture and ecology, and (v) focus on the food choices of the prosperous. There are important nitrogen-carbon links. The global increase in fixed nitrogen may be fertilizing the Earth, transferring significant amounts of carbon from the atmosphere to the biosphere, and mitigating global warming. A modern biofuels industry someday may produce biofuels from crop residues or dedicated energy crops, reducing the rate of fossil fuel use, while losses of nitrogen and other nutrients are minimized.
食物系统通过产生过量的固定氮主导了人为对氮循环的破坏。过量的固定氮以各种形式增强温室效应、减少平流层臭氧、促进烟雾形成、污染饮用水、使雨水酸化、导致海湾和河口富营养化,并给生态系统带来压力。然而,迄今为止,限制这些破坏的监管努力在很大程度上忽略了食物系统。食物和能源之间有许多相似之处。食物之于氮就如同能源之于碳。氮肥类似于化石燃料。有机农业和农业生物技术在政治话语中所起的作用类似于可再生能源和核能。营养研究类似于能源终端使用分析。肉类是食物中的电力。随着农业和食物系统的发展以控制其对氮循环的影响,可以从能源和碳方面吸取几个教训:(i)设定生态系统稳定的目标;(ii)在整个生产和消费系统(谷物、牲畜、食物分配和饮食)中寻找提高效率的机会;(iii)对固定氮实施总量控制与交易制度;(iv)扩大农业与生态学交叉领域的研究;以及(v)关注富裕人群的食物选择。氮和碳之间存在重要联系。全球固定氮的增加可能正在给地球施肥,将大量碳从大气转移到生物圈,并缓解全球变暖。有朝一日,现代生物燃料产业可能利用作物残渣或专用能源作物生产生物燃料,降低化石燃料的使用速率,同时将氮和其他养分的损失降至最低。