Nagarajan S, Mahncke H, Salz T, Tallal P, Roberts T, Merzenich M M
Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-07321, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):6483-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6483.
Magnetoencephalographic responses recorded from auditory cortex evoked by brief and rapidly successive stimuli differed between adults with poor vs. good reading abilities in four important ways. First, the response amplitude evoked by short-duration acoustic stimuli was stronger in the post-stimulus time range of 150-200 ms in poor readers than in normal readers. Second, response amplitude to rapidly successive and brief stimuli that were identical or that differed significantly in frequency were substantially weaker in poor readers compared with controls, for interstimulus intervals of 100 or 200 ms, but not for an interstimulus interval of 500 ms. Third, this neurological deficit closely paralleled subjects' ability to distinguish between and to reconstruct the order of presentation of those stimulus sequences. Fourth, the average distributed response coherence evoked by rapidly successive stimuli was significantly weaker in the beta- and gamma-band frequency ranges (20-60 Hz) in poor readers, compared with controls. These results provide direct electrophysiological evidence supporting the hypothesis that reading disabilities are correlated with the abnormal neural representation of brief and rapidly successive sensory inputs, manifested in this study at the entry level of the cortical auditory/aural speech representational system(s).
在由短暂且快速连续的刺激诱发的听觉皮层所记录的脑磁图反应方面,阅读能力差的成年人与阅读能力好的成年人在四个重要方面存在差异。首先,在150 - 200毫秒的刺激后时间范围内,短时长听觉刺激诱发的反应幅度在阅读能力差的成年人中比正常读者更强。其次,对于间隔时间为100或200毫秒的情况,阅读能力差的成年人对频率相同或频率差异显著的快速连续且短暂刺激的反应幅度与对照组相比明显较弱,但对于500毫秒的刺激间隔则不然。第三,这种神经学缺陷与受试者区分和重构那些刺激序列呈现顺序的能力密切相关。第四,与对照组相比,阅读能力差的成年人在快速连续刺激诱发的β和γ频段(20 - 60赫兹)平均分布式反应相干性明显较弱。这些结果提供了直接的电生理证据,支持了阅读障碍与短暂且快速连续感觉输入的异常神经表征相关的假设,本研究在皮层听觉/听觉言语表征系统的入门水平体现了这一点。