King B F, Erickson B J, Williamson B, Reading C C, James E M, Ramthun S K, Owen D A
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Medical Center, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2 Suppl 1):32-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03168749.
Electronic imaging clinical implementation strategies and principles need to be developed as we move toward replacement of film-based radiology practices. During an 8-month period (1998 to 1999), an Electronic Imaging Clinical Implementation Work Group (EICIWG) was formed from sections of our department: Informatics Lab, Finance Committee, Management Section, Regional Practice Group, as well as several organ and image modality sections of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology. This group was formed to study and implement policies and strategies regarding implementation of electronic imaging into our practice. The following clinical practice issues were identified as key focus areas: (1) optimal electronic worklist organization; (2) how and when to link images with reports; (3) how to redistribute technical and professional relative value units (RVU); (4) how to facilitate future practice changes within our department regarding physical location and work redistribution; and (5) how to integrate off-campus imaging into on-campus workflow. The EICIWG divided their efforts into two phases. Phase I consisted of Fact finding and review of current practice patterns and current economic models, as well as radiology consulting needs. Phase II involved the development of recommendations, policies, and strategies for reengineering the radiology department to maintain current practice goals and use electronic imaging to improve practice patterns. The EICIWG concluded that electronic images should only be released with a formal report, except in emergent situations. Electronic worklists should support and maintain the physical presence of radiologists in critical areas and direct imaging to targeted subspecialists when possible. Case tools should be developed and used in radiology and hospital information systems (RIS/HIS) to monitor a number of parameters, including professional and technical RVU data. As communication standards improve, proper staffing models must be developed to facilitate electronic on-campus and off-campus consultation.
随着我们朝着取代基于胶片的放射学实践迈进,需要制定电子成像临床实施策略和原则。在1998年至1999年的8个月期间,一个电子成像临床实施工作组(EICIWG)由我们部门的多个科室组成:信息学实验室、财务委员会、管理科、区域实践组,以及诊断放射科的几个器官和影像模态科室。成立这个小组是为了研究和实施将电子成像应用于我们实践的政策和策略。以下临床实践问题被确定为关键重点领域:(1)最佳电子工作列表组织;(2)如何以及何时将图像与报告链接;(3)如何重新分配技术和专业相对价值单位(RVU);(4)如何促进我们部门未来在物理位置和工作重新分配方面的实践变革;(5)如何将校外成像整合到校内工作流程中。EICIWG将其工作分为两个阶段。第一阶段包括对当前实践模式和当前经济模型以及放射学咨询需求进行实情调查和审查。第二阶段涉及制定建议、政策和策略,以对放射科进行重新设计,以维持当前的实践目标并利用电子成像改善实践模式。EICIWG得出结论,除紧急情况外,电子图像应仅随正式报告发布。电子工作列表应支持并维持放射科医生在关键区域的实际存在,并在可能的情况下将成像引导至目标亚专科医生。应开发并在放射学和医院信息系统(RIS/HIS)中使用病例工具,以监测包括专业和技术RVU数据在内的多个参数。随着通信标准的提高,必须制定适当的人员配置模式,以促进校内和校外的电子会诊。