Suppr超能文献

行动比不行动更令人后悔吗?

Are Actions Regretted More Than Inactions?

作者信息

Feldman J, Miyamoto J, Loftus EF

机构信息

University of Arizona

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Jun;78(3):232-255. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2833.

Abstract

Several researchers have claimed that negative outcomes produce greater regret when they result from actions rather than from failures to act (Gleicher et al., 1990; Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Landman, 1987). We investigated this claim by asking participants to write descriptions of strongly regretted events in their own lives and to rate the intensity of the regrets. Participants reported more inaction than action regrets, and, contrary to prior research findings, regrets produced by actions and inactions were equally intense. We conjecture that many factors that affect the content of real-life regrets are eliminated in studies of hypothetical regret. In real life, actions and inactions do not generally produce the same outcomes. Furthermore, actions and inactions may differ in how easily one can anticipate the potential for harm. Specifically, it is plausible that people control their actions to avoid potential regrets, leaving themselves vulnerable to regrets from inactions. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

摘要

几位研究者声称,当负面结果由行动导致而非不作为导致时,会产生更大的遗憾(格莱歇尔等人,1990年;卡尼曼和特沃斯基,1982年;兰德曼,1987年)。我们通过要求参与者写下他们生活中深感遗憾的事件描述,并对遗憾的强度进行评分,来研究这一说法。参与者报告的不作为遗憾比行动遗憾更多,并且与先前的研究结果相反,行动和不作为产生的遗憾强度相同。我们推测,在假设性遗憾的研究中,许多影响现实生活中遗憾内容的因素被消除了。在现实生活中,行动和不作为通常不会产生相同的结果。此外,行动和不作为在人们预测潜在危害的难易程度上可能存在差异。具体而言,人们控制自己的行动以避免潜在的遗憾,从而使自己容易因不作为而产生遗憾,这似乎是合理的。版权所有1999年学术出版社。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验