Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3320-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5615-10.2011.
A suboptimal bias toward accepting the status quo option in decision-making is well established behaviorally, but the underlying neural mechanisms are less clear. Behavioral evidence suggests the emotion of regret is higher when errors arise from rejection rather than acceptance of a status quo option. Such asymmetry in the genesis of regret might drive the status quo bias on subsequent decisions, if indeed erroneous status quo rejections have a greater neuronal impact than erroneous status quo acceptances. To test this, we acquired human fMRI data during a difficult perceptual decision task that incorporated a trial-to-trial intrinsic status quo option, with explicit signaling of outcomes (error or correct). Behaviorally, experienced regret was higher after an erroneous status quo rejection compared with acceptance. Anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex showed increased blood oxygenation level-dependent signal after such status quo rejection errors. In line with our hypothesis, a similar pattern of signal change predicted acceptance of the status quo on a subsequent trial. Thus, our data link a regret-induced status quo bias to error-related activity on the preceding trial.
在决策中,对维持现状选项的接受存在次优偏差,这是一种已被充分证实的行为,但背后的神经机制尚不清楚。行为证据表明,当错误源于对现状选项的拒绝而非接受时,后悔情绪会更高。如果错误地拒绝现状选项比错误地接受现状选项具有更大的神经元影响,那么这种后悔的产生不对称性可能会驱动后续决策中的现状偏差。为了验证这一点,我们在一项困难的感知决策任务中获取了人类 fMRI 数据,该任务包含了一个随试内在的现状选项,并明确显示了结果(错误或正确)。行为上,与接受相比,错误地拒绝现状会导致更高的后悔感。在前脑岛和内侧前额叶皮层中,这种拒绝错误后会出现血氧水平依赖信号的增加。与我们的假设一致,类似的信号变化模式预测了在随后的试验中接受现状。因此,我们的数据将后悔引起的现状偏差与前一个试验中的错误相关活动联系起来。