• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义语用障碍与所选语用概念的应用

Semantic pragmatic disorder with application of selected pragmatic concepts.

作者信息

Coulter L

机构信息

Stewartstown Road Health Centre, Dunmurry, Belfast.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1998;33 Suppl:434-8. doi: 10.3109/13682829809179464.

DOI:10.3109/13682829809179464
PMID:10343733
Abstract

Children with semantic pragmatic disorder have been described as having difficulties in conversational interaction. The content of their conversations has been described as 'odd', 'loose', tangential', 'irrelevant' and 'inappropriate' (Stubbs 1986). A diagnosis of semantic pragmatic disorder is currently made based on whether or not a child displays certain surface characteristics. The present study attempts to apply precision to the intuitive terms which have been used to describe these children's conversations. To this end conversation samples from three children identified by speech and language therapists as fitting the clinical diagnosis of semantic pragmatic disorder were analysed. Aspects of pragmatic theory which best explained the strengths and weaknesses which emerged in the conversations are discussed. Therefore this represents an essentially data driven study.

摘要

患有语义语用障碍的儿童被描述为在对话互动中存在困难。他们对话的内容被描述为“奇怪”“松散”“离题”“不相关”和“不恰当”(斯塔布斯,1986年)。目前,语义语用障碍的诊断是基于儿童是否表现出某些表面特征做出的。本研究试图将精确性应用于那些用来描述这些儿童对话的直观术语。为此,分析了言语和语言治疗师认定符合语义语用障碍临床诊断的三个儿童的对话样本。讨论了最能解释对话中出现的优点和缺点的语用理论方面。因此,这是一项本质上由数据驱动的研究。

相似文献

1
Semantic pragmatic disorder with application of selected pragmatic concepts.语义语用障碍与所选语用概念的应用
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1998;33 Suppl:434-8. doi: 10.3109/13682829809179464.
2
Why and when do some language-impaired children seem talkative? A study of initiation in conversations of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Apr;24(2):177-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02172095.
3
The conversational skills of school-aged children with cochlear implants.佩戴人工耳蜗的学龄儿童的对话技巧。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Mar;14(2):67-79. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000002.
4
Do children with social communication disorder have explicit knowledge of pragmatic rules they break? A comparison of conversational pragmatic ability and metapragmatic awareness.患有社会沟通障碍的儿童是否明确知晓他们所违反的语用规则?对话语用能力与元语用意识的比较。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Sep;51(5):508-17. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12227. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
5
Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) scores in 11-year-old children with communication impairments.11岁有沟通障碍儿童的儿童沟通检查表(CCC)评分
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2004 Apr-Jun;39(2):215-27. doi: 10.1080/13682820310001617001.
6
Conversational responsiveness in specific language impairment: evidence of disproportionate pragmatic difficulties in a subset of children.特定语言障碍中的对话反应能力:部分儿童存在不成比例的语用困难的证据。
Dev Psychopathol. 2000 Spring;12(2):177-99. doi: 10.1017/s0954579400002042.
7
Language and pragmatic profile in children with ADHD measured by Children's Communication Checklist 2nd edition.使用《儿童沟通检查表》第二版测量多动症儿童的语言和语用特征。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2014 Dec;39(4):179-87. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2013.784802. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
Exploring the effects of communication intervention for developmental pragmatic language impairments: a signal-generation study.探索沟通干预对发展性语用语言障碍的影响:一项信号生成研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 Jan-Feb;41(1):41-65. doi: 10.1080/13693780500179793.
9
Elicited and spontaneous communicative functions and stability of conversational measures with children who have pragmatic language impairments.患有语用语言障碍儿童的诱发和自发交际功能以及会话测量的稳定性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):333-47. doi: 10.1080/13682820400027768.
10
Pragmatic language skills of students with language and/or learning disabilities: a quantitative synthesis.
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Mar;24(3):147-58. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400303.