Suppr超能文献

院外急救人员进行的分诊、转运及目的地决策。

Triage, transportation, and destination decisions by out-of-hospital emergency care providers.

作者信息

Billittier A J, Lerner E B, Moscati R M, Young G

机构信息

State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, 14215, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 1998 Apr-Dec;13(2-4):22-7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of a tiered emergency medical services system often hinges upon the ability of initial care providers with little or no formal training to identify emergent patient needs and determine the best means to meet those needs.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if out-of-hospital emergency care providers consistently make appropriate triage, transportation, and destination decisions; and to determine if experience and training have an effect on these decisions.

METHODS

A survey consisting of 14 patient-care scenarios was administered to certified and non-certified out-of-hospital emergency-care providers (n = 311) from 20 randomly selected EMS agencies. These agencies were part of EMS systems that utilize one, two, and three tiered responses by ambulance and fire-based commercial, municipal, and volunteer agencies. Participants were asked to select the most appropriate mode of transport and destination facility using the assumption that they had responded to each scenario in a basic life support ambulance. Answers included transporting the patient to various receiving facilities or requesting a more advanced-level unit to respond to the scene. Transport times to receiving facilities and estimated times of arrival for advanced-level units were provided with each choice. Eight emergency physicians unanimously had agreed upon the most appropriate answer for each scenario. A two-tailed t-test was used to compare the scores of the certified and non-certified groups; and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients were used to test the effects of experience and training.

RESULTS

Non-certified providers (n = 108) had a mean score of 32.6% or 4.6 (SD = 1.84) correct answers; certified providers (n = 203) had a mean score of 41.1% or 5.76 (SD = 2.12) correct answers (p < 0.000001). Spearman's Correlation Coefficients were: 1) individual provider level--(0.3978); 2) agency provider level--(0.2741); 3) hours worked per week--(0.2505); 4) years in EMS--(-0.0821); 5) commercial or volunteer provider--(0.2398); 6) agency call volume--(0.2012); 7) agency location--(0.0685), and 8) transporting versus non-transporting agency--(0.2523).

CONCLUSIONS

A need exists for further education of out-of-hospital emergency care providers with respect to triage, transportation, and destination decisions. Provider experience and level of certification do not appear to affect these critical patient-care decisions.

摘要

引言

分级紧急医疗服务系统的有效性通常取决于初始护理人员的能力,这些人员很少或没有接受过正规培训,却要识别患者的紧急需求并确定满足这些需求的最佳方式。

目的

确定院外急救人员是否始终能做出恰当的分诊、转运和目的地决策;并确定经验和培训对这些决策是否有影响。

方法

对来自20个随机挑选的急救机构的已认证和未认证的院外急救人员(n = 311)进行了一项包含14个患者护理场景的调查。这些机构是急救系统的一部分,急救系统通过救护车以及基于消防的商业、市政和志愿机构采用一级、二级和三级响应模式。假设参与者是乘坐基本生命支持救护车对每个场景做出响应,要求他们选择最合适的运输方式和目的地机构。答案包括将患者转运到各种接收机构或请求更高级别的单位前往现场。每个选项都提供了到接收机构的运输时间以及高级别单位的预计到达时间。八位急诊医生一致为每个场景确定了最合适的答案。使用双尾t检验比较已认证组和未认证组的得分;并使用斯皮尔曼相关系数来测试经验和培训的影响。

结果

未认证的急救人员(n = 108)的平均得分为32.6%或4.6分(标准差 = 1.84),正确答案数量为4.6个;已认证的急救人员(n = 203)的平均得分为41.1%或5.76分(标准差 = 2.12),正确答案数量为5.76个(p < 0.000001)。斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为:1)个人急救人员水平——(0.3978);2)机构急救人员水平——(0.2741);3)每周工作小时数——(0.2505);4)从事急救工作的年限——(-0.0821);5)商业或志愿急救人员——(0.2398);6)机构呼叫量——(0.2012);7)机构位置——(0.0685);8)运输与非运输机构——(0.2523)。

结论

对于院外急救人员在分诊、转运和目的地决策方面的继续教育存在需求。急救人员的经验和认证水平似乎并未影响这些关键的患者护理决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验