• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单种植体全瓷基台修复体在静态载荷下的强度及失效模式

Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.

作者信息

Tripodakis A P, Strub J R, Kappert H F, Witkowski S

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1995 May-Jun;8(3):265-72.

PMID:10348596
Abstract

The strength and mode of failure of three different designs of custom-made all-ceramic implant abutments fabricated by milling of In-Ceram sintered ceramic blocks were compared with the conventional CeraOne system under static load. Four test groups were formed with different locations of abutment screws. In three test groups, In-Ceram crowns were fabricated for placement on the all-ceramic abutments, and in one test group, a veneer porcelain was fired directly on the abutment; crowns in the control group were fabricated using the CeraOne system. Ten-mm-long Brånemark implants were placed into a brass block that allowed loading at a 30-degree angle to the long axis. The test group in which the veneer porcelain was fired directly on the all-ceramic abutments was the weakest, and it showed fractures at a mean value of 236 N. The fracture strength of the three other test groups was dependent on the extension of the crown margin relative to the location of the screw head. The test group that had the screw on the top compressing the entire ceramic abutment showed a mean value of 422 N that was similar to the results that were achieved with the CeraOne system (427 N). The weakest link in the all-ceramic single implant restorations was the abutment screw in which the bending began at approximately 190 N.

摘要

在静态载荷下,将通过铣削In-Ceram烧结陶瓷块制造的三种不同设计的定制全陶瓷种植体基台的强度和失效模式与传统的CeraOne系统进行了比较。根据基台螺钉的不同位置形成了四个测试组。在三个测试组中,制作In-Ceram冠用于放置在全陶瓷基台上,在一个测试组中,直接在基台上烧制饰面瓷;对照组的冠使用CeraOne系统制作。将10毫米长的Brånemark种植体植入一个黄铜块中,该黄铜块允许以与长轴成30度角的方向加载。直接在全陶瓷基台上烧制饰面瓷的测试组是最薄弱的,其在平均值236 N时出现骨折。其他三个测试组的断裂强度取决于冠边缘相对于螺钉头部位置的延伸。螺钉位于顶部压缩整个陶瓷基台的测试组的平均值为422 N,与CeraOne系统获得的结果(427 N)相似。全陶瓷单种植体修复体中最薄弱的环节是基台螺钉,其在大约190 N时开始弯曲。

相似文献

1
Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.单种植体全瓷基台修复体在静态载荷下的强度及失效模式
Int J Prosthodont. 1995 May-Jun;8(3):265-72.
2
Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.锆及金属种植体基台的抗折性与失效位置
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1;9(7):41-8.
3
A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.一项关于使用铣削陶瓷基台和全瓷冠的种植体支持修复体断裂强度的研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):9-13.
4
Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.单颗种植体支持的全瓷修复体的抗折性:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.003.
5
Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.基于二氧化锆的牙科修复体。临床性能和断裂行为的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2011(213):9-84.
6
The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.全瓷冠和金属烤瓷冠的饰面瓷厚度对循环加载后抗折性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Feb;101(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60006-8.
7
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
8
Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.螺钉固位、粘结固位和螺钉粘结固位的种植体支持金属陶瓷后牙冠的瓷裂阻力。
J Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;19(4):263-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00560.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
9
The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.临时粘接剂与基台表面粗糙度对临时种植体支持冠固位力的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jun;95(6):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.020.
10
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of fracture strength in implant supported zirconia-titanium base abutments.种植体支持的氧化锆-钛基台断裂强度的比较
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):665-668. doi: 10.6026/973206300200665. eCollection 2024.
2
Measurement of Fracture Strength of Zirconia Dental Implant Abutments with Internal and External Connections Using Acoustic Emission.使用声发射测量具有内连接和外连接的氧化锆牙种植体基台的断裂强度
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 23;12(12):2009. doi: 10.3390/ma12122009.