• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单颗种植体支持的全瓷修复体的抗折性:一项体外研究。

Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Att Wael, Kurun Sirin, Gerds Thomas, Strub Joerg R

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.003
PMID:16473084
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

High-strength ceramic materials can be used to fabricate esthetic and stable implant-supported single-tooth restorations. No study was identified that compared the fracture resistance of individual components of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorative systems after artificial aging.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations consisting of alumina all-ceramic restorations on different implant abutments and to identify the weakest component of the restorative system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-eight standardized maxillary central incisor alumina crowns (Procera) were fabricated for each of the 3 test groups (n = 16) (Control group Ti, titanium abutments; Group Al, alumina abutments; Group Zr, zirconia abutments) for the Replace implant system. The crowns were adhesively luted using a resin luting agent (Panavia 21) and artificially aged through dynamic loading and thermal cycling. Afterwards, all specimens were tested for fracture resistance using compressive load on the palatal surfaces of the crowns. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and post hoc Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to test for differences in fracture resistance values (alpha = .05).

RESULTS

All test specimens survived the artificial aging process using simulated oral conditions. No screw loosening was recorded. The median fracture resistance was 1454 N, 422.5 N, and 443.6 N for groups Ti, Al, and Zr, respectively. Significant differences were found for the fracture resistance comparisons of group Ti with groups Al and Zr (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < .001). The test results for the comparison of groups Al and Zr were not significant.

CONCLUSION

All 3 implant-supported restorations have the potential to withstand physiologic occlusal forces applied in the anterior region.

摘要

问题陈述

高强度陶瓷材料可用于制作美观且稳定的种植体支持的单颗牙修复体。未发现有研究比较单颗牙种植体支持的全瓷修复系统各组件在人工老化后的抗折强度。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估由不同种植体基台上的氧化铝全瓷修复体组成的单颗牙种植体支持的全瓷修复体的抗折强度,并确定修复系统中最薄弱的组件。

材料与方法

为Replace种植系统的3个试验组(n = 16)(对照组Ti,钛基台;Al组,氧化铝基台;Zr组,氧化锆基台)各制作48个标准化的上颌中切牙氧化铝全瓷冠(Procera)。使用树脂粘结剂(Panavia 21)将全瓷冠粘结就位,并通过动态加载和热循环进行人工老化。之后,对所有标本在全瓷冠腭面施加压缩载荷以测试抗折强度。进行Kruskal-Wallis方差分析和事后Wilcoxon秩和检验以测试抗折强度值的差异(α = .05)。

结果

所有测试标本在模拟口腔条件下的人工老化过程中均存活。未记录到螺钉松动。Ti组、Al组和Zr组的抗折强度中位数分别为1454 N、422.5 N和443.6 N。Ti组与Al组和Zr组的抗折强度比较存在显著差异(Kruskal-Wallis检验,P < .001)。Al组和Zr组的比较测试结果不显著。

结论

所有3种种植体支持的修复体都有可能承受前牙区施加的生理咬合力。

相似文献

1
Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.单颗种植体支持的全瓷修复体的抗折性:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.003.
2
Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth.暴露于人工口腔后单颗种植体支持的全瓷修复体的抗折性
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 May;33(5):380-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01571.x.
3
Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.锆及金属种植体基台的抗折性与失效位置
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1;9(7):41-8.
4
Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.氧化锆种植体支持的全瓷冠可承受长期负荷:一项初步研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):565-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01252.x.
5
Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):167-71.
6
Fracture resistance of different zirconium dioxide three-unit all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.不同二氧化锆三单位全瓷固定局部义齿的抗折性
Acta Odontol Scand. 2007 Feb;65(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/00016350600856232.
7
Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.基于二氧化锆的牙科修复体。临床性能和断裂行为的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2011(213):9-84.
8
Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.全瓷冠在种植体基台上的边缘适合性。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):218-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00079.x. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
9
A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.一项关于使用铣削陶瓷基台和全瓷冠的种植体支持修复体断裂强度的研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):9-13.
10
Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.螺钉固位、粘结固位和螺钉粘结固位的种植体支持金属陶瓷后牙冠的瓷裂阻力。
J Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;19(4):263-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00560.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro evaluation of the mechanical and optical properties of 3D printed vs CAD/CAM milled denture teeth materials.3D打印与CAD/CAM铣削义齿材料的机械和光学性能的体外评估
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Sep;36(9):1227-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.牙种植体骨折的临床因素:一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200.
3
Shear Strength of Repaired 3D-Printed and Milled Provisional Materials Using Different Resin Materials with and without Chemical and Mechanical Surface Treatment.
使用不同树脂材料、有无化学和机械表面处理的3D打印和铣削临时材料修复后的剪切强度。
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;15(21):4284. doi: 10.3390/polym15214284.
4
Influence of long -term thermal cycling and masticatory loading simulation on bond strength of roots filled with epoxy resin and calcium silicate based sealers.长期热循环和咀嚼负荷模拟对环氧树脂和硅酸钙基封闭剂填充根的粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03377-1.
5
Comparison of the outcomes and complications of three-unit porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth-implant-supported prostheses with implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.三单位烤瓷熔附金属牙种植体支持的修复体与种植体支持的修复体的疗效及并发症比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Jan 18;20:3. eCollection 2023.
6
The effect of aging on the fracture resistance of different types of screw-cement-retained implant-supported zirconia-based restorations.不同类型螺钉固位式种植体支持氧化锆修复体的抗折性能随年龄变化的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270527. eCollection 2022.
7
A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.一项为期 5 年的随机对照临床试验比较了在前磨牙区域使用氧化锆基和金属基种植体支持的单颗修复体。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):792-803. doi: 10.1111/clr.13960. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Mechanical Stability of Screw-Retained Monolithic and Bi-layer Posterior Hybrid Abutment Crowns after Thermomechanical Loading: An In Vitro Study.热机械加载后螺丝固位整体式和双层后牙混合基台冠的机械稳定性:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;14(24):7539. doi: 10.3390/ma14247539.
9
Evaluation of Stress Generated with Different Abutment Materials and Angulations under Axial and Oblique Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.上颌前部轴向和斜向加载下不同基台材料及角度产生的应力评估:三维有限元分析
Int J Dent. 2021 Dec 1;2021:9205930. doi: 10.1155/2021/9205930. eCollection 2021.
10
The Fracture Resistance of Additively Manufactured Monolithic Zirconia vs. Bi-Layered Alumina Toughened Zirconia Crowns When Cemented to Zirconia Abutments. Evaluating the Potential of 3D Printing of Ceramic Crowns: An In Vitro Study.增材制造的整体式氧化锆与双层氧化铝增韧氧化锆冠粘结到氧化锆基台上时的抗折性。评估陶瓷冠3D打印的潜力:一项体外研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Oct 8;9(10):115. doi: 10.3390/dj9100115.