Cullen M R
Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:1-13. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.1.
The history of occupational health in the United States during the twentieth century demonstrates pendular swings, with periods of rapid progress followed by periods of reversal. Happily, the last three decades have witnessed the most impressive gains, with establishment of a near-universal system for regulating conditions in the workplace, legitimization and growth of the occupational health professions, a marked increase in scientific research, most notably epidemiology, and the transfer of knowledge about occupational health to affected workers and the larger US population. Not surprisingly, rates of injury and illness have fallen. However, analysis of these cyclical historic changes suggests that extrinsic factors--broad social currents, changes in health care financing, and societal perceptions of health and disease--have dominated over enhanced scientific knowledge, technologic changes or professional achievements, usually the determinants of medical or public health advances. Practitioners of occupational health are not, and have never been, in a particularly advantageous position to fashion future events in their own field, and the current situation, however encouraging, is likely no exception.
20世纪美国职业健康的历史呈现出钟摆式的波动,先是快速发展时期,随后是倒退时期。幸运的是,过去三十年取得了最令人瞩目的进展,建立了几乎覆盖全面的工作场所条件监管体系,职业健康专业得以合法化并不断发展,科研工作显著增加,尤其是流行病学方面,并且有关职业健康的知识也传播给了受影响的工人以及更广大的美国民众。不出所料,工伤和疾病发生率有所下降。然而,对这些周期性历史变化的分析表明,外部因素——广泛的社会潮流、医疗保健融资的变化以及社会对健康与疾病的认知——比增强的科学知识、技术变革或专业成就发挥了更大的主导作用,而这些通常是医学或公共卫生进步的决定因素。职业健康从业者现在并非,而且从来都没有处于特别有利的地位来塑造其所在领域的未来发展,当前的形势无论多么令人鼓舞,可能也不例外。