Melliere D, Cron J, Allaire E, Desgranges P, Becquemin J P
Vascular Surgery Unit of Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris-Val de Marne University, Créteil, France.
Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Mar;7(2):242-6. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00078-7.
Combined balloon angioplasty and conventional revascularization are occasionally performed but some points are still controversial: which patients are eligible for this associated procedure?; should the procedures be performed simultaneously or successively?; and in case of simultaneous procedure, which one should be performed first? To answer these questions, the notes of 64 patients consecutively submitted to this procedure at the Henri Mondor hospital were reviewed. Arterial dilatation was performed on the iliac artery, superficial femoral artery, popliteal artery or tibioperoneal trunk in 31, 26, four and four patients, respectively. Reasons for simultaneous procedures were multiple occlusive lesions in 67% of patients and inflow improvement in 14%. The others reasons included iliac obstruction in poor risk patients, unilateral failure of planned bilateral iliac balloon angioplasty, outflow improvement, local contraindication to arterial approach, shortness of vein graft, clamp injury during open surgery and inadequate patient position for both procedures. Complications were rare. One patient died of recurrent sepsis of the femoro-femoral bypass. The 5-year limb salvage rate was 91%. In this study, simultaneous procedures were associated with three advantages: the risk of septic complications associated with graft implantations in a previously punctured site was decreased, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy did not need to be modified before the second procedure, hospital length of stay and cost appeared to be lower. On a simultaneous procedure, it is recommended that the balloon angioplasty be performed after the conventional procedure in order to avoid clamping a recently dilated artery when performing the bypass.
联合球囊血管成形术和传统血运重建术偶尔会实施,但仍存在一些争议点:哪些患者适合这种联合手术?手术应同时进行还是先后进行?若同时进行,应先进行哪一项?为回答这些问题,我们回顾了在亨利·蒙多医院连续接受该手术的64例患者的病历。分别对31例、26例、4例和4例患者的髂动脉、股浅动脉、腘动脉或胫腓干进行了动脉扩张。同时进行手术的原因中,67%的患者存在多处闭塞性病变,14%的患者为改善流入道。其他原因包括高危患者的髂动脉阻塞、计划中的双侧髂动脉球囊血管成形术单侧失败、改善流出道、动脉入路的局部禁忌证、静脉移植物短缺、开放手术期间的夹伤以及两种手术患者体位不合适。并发症罕见。1例患者死于股-股旁路移植术后复发性败血症。5年肢体挽救率为91%。在本研究中,同时进行手术有三个优点:降低了在先前穿刺部位植入移植物相关的感染并发症风险,在第二次手术前无需调整抗凝和/或抗血小板治疗,住院时间和费用似乎更低。对于同时进行的手术,建议在传统手术后进行球囊血管成形术,以避免在进行旁路手术时夹闭最近扩张的动脉。