Addy M, Renton-Harper P, Warren P, Newcombe R G
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Bristol, England, UK.
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 May;26(5):289-93. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260505.x.
Instructions on the use of electric toothbrushes are usually derived from the written and/or diagrammatic leaflets provided with the device or perhaps less often instruction from a professional. Videos are now widely used for information transfer and the direction of physical activities. The aim of this study was to determine whether video instruction in the use of an electric toothbrush could promote efficient use of the device. The 2-min video demonstrated the use of an oscillating, rotating electric toothbrush used by a hygienist for 15 s in each buccal and lingual quadrant. A voice-over directed the observer to follow the hygienist's movements. The study was planned as a 2-phase, single-examiner blind, randomised, cross-over study accepting there would be confounding of the 2nd period by carry-over from the 1st. A group of 24 healthy volunteers participated who had average oral hygiene and never used an electric toothbrush. 12 subjects received the video first (VN) and 12 subjects the instructional leaflet with the device (NV). Single brushings were performed after suspending tooth cleaning for 48 h. Plaque was scored before and after brushing. A 2-week washout period was permitted before the crossover. In period 1, plaque removal with the video was overall significantly greater than with written instructions. The effects for posterior teeth were greater than anterior and comparison between groups for posterior minus anterior differences were highly significant in favour of the VN group. In period 2, the effect of period was dominant with both groups achieving greater plaque removal in period 2 than period 1. Plaque removal by group VN remained considerably greater than group NV Despite the confounding influences of carry-over in this particular design of study, the results support the idea that video instruction for electric toothbrushes could be a simple and efficient way of improving plaque removal by these devices. The methodology needs to be verified in a home-use type of investigation.
电动牙刷的使用说明通常来自随设备提供的书面和/或图示传单,或者较少情况下来自专业人士的指导。视频现在被广泛用于信息传递和体育活动指导。本研究的目的是确定电动牙刷使用的视频指导是否能促进该设备的有效使用。这个2分钟的视频展示了一名口腔保健员在每个颊侧和舌侧象限使用振动旋转式电动牙刷15秒的过程。旁白引导观察者跟随口腔保健员的动作。该研究计划为两阶段、单检查者盲法、随机交叉研究,承认第二阶段会受到第一阶段遗留效应的混杂影响。一组24名健康志愿者参与了研究,他们口腔卫生状况一般,从未使用过电动牙刷。12名受试者先观看视频(VN组),12名受试者先收到随设备提供的说明书(NV组)。在停止刷牙48小时后进行单次刷牙。刷牙前后对牙菌斑进行评分。交叉前允许有两周的洗脱期。在第一阶段,使用视频时的牙菌斑清除总体上显著高于使用书面说明时。后牙的效果大于前牙,两组后牙与前牙清除差异的比较对VN组非常有利。在第二阶段,阶段效应占主导,两组在第二阶段的牙菌斑清除都比第一阶段多。VN组的牙菌斑清除仍远高于NV组。尽管在这个特定的研究设计中存在遗留效应的混杂影响,但结果支持这样的观点,即电动牙刷的视频指导可能是一种简单有效的方法来提高这些设备的牙菌斑清除效果。该方法需要在家庭使用类型的调查中进行验证。