Heithersay G S
Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Quintessence Int. 1999 Feb;30(2):83-95.
An investigation was undertaken to assess potential predisposing factors to invasive cervical resorption.
A group of 222 patients with a total of 257 teeth displaying varying degrees of invasive cervical resorption were analyzed. Potential predisposing factors, including trauma, intracoronal bleaching, surgery, orthodontics, periodontal root scaling or planing, bruxism, delayed eruption, developmental defects, and restorations were assessed from the patients' history and oral examination.
Of the potential predisposing factors identified, orthodontics was the most common sole factor, constituting 21.2% of patients and 24.1% of teeth examined. Other factors were present in an additional 5.0% of orthodontically treated patients (4.3% of teeth), and these consisted principally of trauma and/or intracoronal bleaching. Trauma was the second most frequent sole factor (14.0% of patients and 15.1% of teeth). Trauma in combination with intracoronal bleaching, orthodontics, or delayed eruption constituted an additional 11.2% of patients (10.6% of teeth). Intracoronal bleaching was found to be the sole potential predisposing factor in 4.5% of patients and 3.9% of teeth, and an additional 10.4% of patients and 9.7% of teeth showed a combination of intracoronal bleaching with trauma and/or orthodontics. Surgery, particularly involving the cementoenamel junction area, was a sole potential predisposing factor in 6.3% of patients and 5.4% of teeth. Periodontal therapy, including deep root scaling and planing, showed a low incidence, as did other factors, such as bruxism and developmental defects. The presence of an intracoronal restoration was the only identifiable factor in 15.3% of patients and 14.4% of teeth, while 15.0% of patients and 16.4% of teeth showed no identifiable potential pedisposing factors.
These results indicated a strong association between invasive cervical resorption and orthodontic treatment, trauma, and intracoronal bleaching, either alone or in combination.
开展一项调查以评估侵袭性牙颈部吸收的潜在诱发因素。
分析一组222例患者,这些患者共有257颗牙齿表现出不同程度的侵袭性牙颈部吸收。从患者病史和口腔检查中评估潜在诱发因素,包括创伤、冠内漂白、手术、正畸治疗、牙周牙根刮治或平整、磨牙症、萌出延迟、发育缺陷和修复体。
在已确定的潜在诱发因素中,正畸治疗是最常见的单一因素,占患者的21.2%和所检查牙齿的24.1%。在另外5.0%接受正畸治疗的患者中(占牙齿的4.3%)存在其他因素,这些因素主要包括创伤和/或冠内漂白。创伤是第二常见的单一因素(占患者的14.0%和牙齿的15.1%)。创伤与冠内漂白、正畸治疗或萌出延迟共同构成另外11.2%的患者(占牙齿的10.6%)。发现冠内漂白是4.5%的患者和3.9%的牙齿的唯一潜在诱发因素,另外10.4%的患者和9.7%的牙齿表现出冠内漂白与创伤和/或正畸治疗的组合。手术,特别是涉及牙骨质釉质交界区的手术,是6.3%的患者和5.4%的牙齿的唯一潜在诱发因素。牙周治疗,包括深根刮治和平整,发生率较低,其他因素如磨牙症和发育缺陷也是如此。冠内修复体的存在是15.3%的患者和14.4%的牙齿中唯一可识别的因素,而15.0%的患者和16.4%的牙齿未显示可识别的潜在诱发因素。
这些结果表明侵袭性牙颈部吸收与正畸治疗、创伤和冠内漂白之间存在密切关联,无论是单独还是联合存在。