Suppr超能文献

患者自控镇痛治疗期间预防性使用止吐药的疗效与不良反应:一项定量系统评价

Efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic antiemetics during patient-controlled analgesia therapy: a quantitative systematic review.

作者信息

Tramèr M R, Walder B

机构信息

Department APSIC, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1999 Jun;88(6):1354-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199906000-00030.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Nausea and vomiting are frequent adverse effects of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids. To identify the optimal prophylactic antiemetic intervention in this setting, we performed a systematic search for randomized trials (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, reference lists, hand-searching, no language restriction) published up to May 1998 that compared prophylactic antiemetic interventions with placebo or no treatment in the postoperative PCA-setting with opioids. Fourteen placebo-controlled trials (1117 patients) with different regimens of droperidol, ondansetron, hyoscine TTS, tropisetron, metoclopramide, propofol, and promethazine were analyzed. One PCA was with tramadol, all others were with morphine. At 24 h, the cumulative incidence of nausea and vomiting without antiemetics was approximately 50%. Droperidol 0.017-0.17 mg/mg of morphine (0.5-11 mg/d droperidol) was statistically significantly more effective than placebo without evidence of dose-responsiveness; the number needed to treat to prevent nausea compared with placebo was 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.8-5.2), and that to prevent vomiting was 3.1 (2.3-4.8). Compared with placebo, the incidence of minor adverse effects with droperidol was increased with doses >4 mg/d.

IMPLICATIONS

Of 100 patients treated with droperidol added in a patient-controlled analgesia pump with morphine, 30 who would have vomited or been nauseated had they not received droperidol will not suffer these effects. There is no evidence of dose-responsiveness for efficacy with droperidol, but the risk of adverse effects is dose-dependent. There is a lack of evidence for other antiemetics.

摘要

未加标签

恶心和呕吐是阿片类药物患者自控镇痛(PCA)常见的不良反应。为确定在此情况下最佳的预防性止吐干预措施,我们对截至1998年5月发表的随机试验(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、参考文献列表、手工检索,无语言限制)进行了系统检索,这些试验比较了在术后阿片类药物PCA环境中预防性止吐干预措施与安慰剂或不治疗的效果。分析了14项安慰剂对照试验(1117例患者),涉及不同剂量的氟哌利多、昂丹司琼、东莨菪碱透皮贴剂、托烷司琼、甲氧氯普胺、丙泊酚和异丙嗪。1项PCA使用曲马多,其他均使用吗啡。在24小时时,未使用止吐药的恶心和呕吐累积发生率约为50%。每毫克吗啡使用0.017 - 0.17毫克氟哌利多(每日0.5 - 11毫克氟哌利多)在统计学上比安慰剂显著更有效,且无剂量反应性证据;与安慰剂相比,预防恶心的需治疗人数为2.7(95%置信区间1.8 - 5.2),预防呕吐的需治疗人数为3.1(2.3 - 4.8)。与安慰剂相比,氟哌利多剂量>4毫克/天时,轻微不良反应发生率增加。

启示

在吗啡患者自控镇痛泵中添加氟哌利多治疗的100例患者中,若未接受氟哌利多,原本会呕吐或恶心的30例患者将不会出现这些症状。没有证据表明氟哌利多的疗效存在剂量反应性,但不良反应风险与剂量相关。缺乏其他止吐药的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验