Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas L G
University of Toronto, Division of Plastic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jun;103(7):1819-25. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199906000-00002.
Three methods of obtaining digital photographs in a clinical setting were compared using direct anthropometry as a reference standard. The methods included a digital camera, scanning negatives from a 35-mm single-lens reflex camera, and scanning Polaroid photographs taken with a Polaroid camera designed for medical documentation. A total of 11 angular and linear anthropometric measurements obtained from 30 healthy volunteers were used for the comparison. The data were analyzed using a variance covariance approach to repeated measures. The analysis revealed that the three cameras were not statistically different from each other. Other advantages and disadvantages, such as cost and ease of use, are discussed.
以直接人体测量法作为参考标准,比较了在临床环境中获取数码照片的三种方法。这些方法包括使用数码相机、扫描35毫米单镜头反光相机的底片以及扫描用专为医学记录设计的宝丽来相机拍摄的宝丽来照片。从30名健康志愿者身上获取的总共11项角度和线性人体测量数据用于比较。使用方差协方差方法对重复测量数据进行分析。分析表明,这三台相机在统计学上没有差异。还讨论了其他优缺点,如成本和易用性。