• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否安全且具有成本效益?一种研究护理过渡的模型。

Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care.

作者信息

Fleisher L A, Yee K, Lillemoe K D, Talamini M A, Yeo C J, Heath R, Bass E, Snyder D S, Parker S D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1746-55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00033.

DOI:10.1097/00000542-199906000-00033
PMID:10360875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing pressure to perform traditional inpatient surgical procedures in an outpatient setting. The aim of the current trial was to determine the safety and cost savings of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an outpatient setting using a "mock" outpatient setting.

METHODS

Patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy by four attending surgeons and for whom operating time was available in the outpatient center were studied. All patients received a standardized anesthetic, including ondansetron, and were discharged from the outpatient postanesthesia care unit if appropriate. At discharge, all patients were admitted to a clinical research center where they were observed in a "mock home" setting and monitored for complications that would have necessitated readmission. A decision analysis was created assuming all patients underwent outpatient surgery with either direct admission or discharge to home and readmission if complications developed.

RESULTS

Of 99 patients who were enrolled in this study, 96 patients would have met the discharge criteria for home. No major complications were observed in these 96 patients. Eleven patients experienced postoperative nausea and vomiting, 3 of whom required an additional 24 h of hospital observation. In the decision model, the optimal strategy would be to perform the procedure on an outpatient basis and readmit patients only for complications, with an average baseline cost savings of $742/patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and cost-effective in selected patients, and that the mock home setting provides a means of studying the safety of transition of care.

摘要

背景

在门诊环境中开展传统住院手术的压力日益增大。当前试验的目的是确定在模拟门诊环境中进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和成本节约情况。

方法

对由四位主治外科医生安排进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术且在门诊中心有可用手术时间的患者进行研究。所有患者均接受标准化麻醉,包括昂丹司琼,若情况合适则从门诊麻醉后护理单元出院。出院时,所有患者被收治到临床研究中心,在模拟家庭环境中接受观察,并监测可能需要再次入院的并发症。创建了一个决策分析模型,假设所有患者都接受门诊手术,要么直接入院,要么出院回家,若出现并发症则再次入院。

结果

在纳入本研究的99例患者中,96例符合出院回家的标准。这96例患者未观察到重大并发症。11例患者出现术后恶心和呕吐,其中3例需要额外24小时的住院观察。在决策模型中,最佳策略是在门诊进行手术,仅因并发症再次收治患者,平均每位患者可节约基线成本742美元。

结论

结果表明,门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术在特定患者中是安全且具有成本效益的,模拟家庭环境为研究护理过渡的安全性提供了一种方法。

相似文献

1
Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否安全且具有成本效益?一种研究护理过渡的模型。
Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1746-55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00033.
2
In selected patients outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and significantly reduces hospitalization charges.对于部分选定患者,门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全的,且能显著降低住院费用。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Dec;1(4):240-5.
3
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: implementation and audit of 136 consecutive cases in a university hospital.腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为日间手术:一所大学医院连续136例病例的实施与审计
World J Surg. 2004 Aug;28(8):737-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7376-6. Epub 2004 Aug 3.
4
AMBULATORY LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS SAFE AND COST-EFFECTIVE: a Brazilian single center experience.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全且具有成本效益:巴西单中心经验
Arq Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;53(2):103-7. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032016000200010.
5
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasibility.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996 Apr;6(2):73-7. doi: 10.1089/lps.1996.6.73.
6
Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients?日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术:特定患者的首选治疗方法?
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):70-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0787-0. Epub 2006 Sep 23.
7
Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本效益
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4.
8
A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing transdermal scopolamine plus ondansetron to ondansetron alone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the outpatient setting.一项随机、双盲、多中心试验,比较透皮东莨菪碱加昂丹司琼与单用昂丹司琼在门诊环境中预防术后恶心和呕吐的效果。
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1498-504. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e431f.
9
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术
HPB Surg. 1994;7(4):261-4. doi: 10.1155/1994/70629.
10
Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes.非住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果。
JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):473-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Focus on patient perspectives in climate action policies for healthcare. A German survey analysis on what patients are willing to do.关注医疗保健领域气候行动政策中的患者视角。一项关于患者意愿的德国调查分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;12:1477313. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477313. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者选择:一项系统评价
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):176-180. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21.
3
Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
腹腔镜抢救手术是治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难患者的有效方法。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1611-1616. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01266-w. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Day Care Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Next Standard of Care for Gall Stone Disease.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术:胆结石疾病的下一个护理标准
Gastroenterology Res. 2011 Dec;4(6):257-261. doi: 10.4021/gr374w. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
5
The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10-Year Period, 2000-2010.2000 年至 2010 年期间住院阴茎假体数量下降。
Sex Med. 2015 Sep 17;3(4):280-6. doi: 10.1002/sm2.82. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means?机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的住院患者分析:结果能否证明手段合理?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec;18(12):2116-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2673-3. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: is it safe?--an egyptian experience.腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为日间手术程序:安全吗?——埃及的经验。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):277-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.82584.
8
Introduction of a day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy service in the UK: a critical analysis of factors influencing same-day discharge and contact with primary care providers.英国日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术服务的引入:对影响当日出院及与初级医疗服务提供者联系的因素的批判性分析
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Oct;91(7):583-90. doi: 10.1308/003588409X432365. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
9
Change in use of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions among surgical patients.外科手术患者同种异体红细胞输注使用情况的变化。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Sep;207(3):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
10
Resumption of daily physical activity after day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术后日常身体活动的恢复
Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2034-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9928-6. Epub 2008 Apr 25.