AbuRahma A F, Robinson P A, Stickler D L
Department of Surgery, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University, Charleston, USA.
Ann Surg. 1999 Jun;229(6):767-72; discussion 772-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199906000-00002.
Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been reported to vary between a few percent and 30%. Regression of recurrent stenosis has been reported sporadically in the literature, but studies analyzing the factors affecting regression are lacking. This study analyzed factors affecting the regression of postoperative stenosis from a prospective randomized trial of CEA comparing primary closure (PC) versus patching.
Three hundred ninety-nine CEAs were randomized into three groups: 135 PCs, 135 polytetrafluoroethylene patch closures (PTFE), and 130 vein patch closures (VPC). Postoperative duplex ultrasounds were done at 1, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly. The subgroup of these CEAs that exhibited postoperative stenosis was followed for possible regression of the stenosis. Analyses of various risk factors were examined for possible association with regression of recurrent stenosis. Mean follow-up was 46 months.
Of 105 postoperative stenoses, regression was noted in 6/64 (9%) in PC, 6/13 (46%) in PTFE, and 10/28 (36%) in VPC. Overall, 22 recurrent stenoses regressed; 19 regressed to normal and 3 regressed from 50% to 80% stenosis to 20% to <50% stenosis. The mean time to regression was 383 days. Regression was more common in patching than PC. Both VPC and PTFE had significantly more regression than PC. When stenoses of 50% to 80% were analyzed, patching had more regression than PC. None of the recurrent stenoses > or = 80% regressed. There was no association between regression and other factors, including gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, smoking, internal carotid artery diameter, hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, or aspirin intake.
Regression of recurrent stenosis was associated more strongly with patching than with PC. There was no association between regression and other factors.
据报道,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后复发性狭窄的发生率在百分之几到30%之间。文献中偶尔有关于复发性狭窄消退的报道,但缺乏分析影响消退因素的研究。本研究从一项比较一期缝合(PC)与补片修补的CEA前瞻性随机试验中分析影响术后狭窄消退的因素。
399例CEA患者被随机分为三组:135例一期缝合,135例聚四氟乙烯补片修补(PTFE),130例静脉补片修补(VPC)。术后在1、6和12个月进行双功超声检查,之后每年检查一次。对这些出现术后狭窄的CEA亚组进行随访,观察狭窄是否可能消退。分析各种危险因素,以检查其与复发性狭窄消退的可能关联。平均随访时间为46个月。
在105例术后狭窄中,一期缝合组64例中有6例(9%)狭窄消退,PTFE组13例中有6例(46%)狭窄消退,VPC组28例中有10例(36%)狭窄消退。总体而言,22例复发性狭窄消退;19例消退至正常,3例从50%至80%的狭窄消退至20%至<50%的狭窄。消退的平均时间为383天。补片修补组比一期缝合组狭窄消退更常见。VPC组和PTFE组的狭窄消退均显著多于一期缝合组。当分析50%至80%的狭窄时,补片修补组比一期缝合组狭窄消退更多。没有一例复发性狭窄≥80%消退。狭窄消退与其他因素之间无关联,这些因素包括性别、高血压、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病、吸烟、颈内动脉直径、高脂血症、高胆固醇血症或阿司匹林摄入。
复发性狭窄的消退与补片修补的关联比与一期缝合的关联更强。狭窄消退与其他因素之间无关联。