Suppr超能文献

颈动脉补片的益处:一项长期随访的前瞻性随机研究。

Benefits of carotid patching: a prospective randomized study with long-term follow-up.

作者信息

De Letter J A, Moll F L, Welten R J, Eikelboom B C, Ackerstaff R G, Vermeulen F E, Algra A

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 1994 Jan;8(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02133406.

Abstract

A prospective study with random selection between primary closure and saphenous vein patching after carotid endarterectomy was conducted. Patients were evaluated with intravenous digital subtraction angiography during the initial postoperative period, followed by duplex scanning at 3 and 6 months, and then yearly examinations. The series consisted of 129 carotid endarterectomies, of which 62 were primary closures and 67 were patch procedures. Both groups were identical with regard to risk factors, symptoms, and postoperative control digital subtraction angiography. Restenosis was defined as a stenosis with > or = 50% diameter reduction, as assessed by duplex scanning. Of special interest was the development of restenosis along with the occurrence of cerebrovascular symptoms at long-term follow-up. The follow-up data from the 129 carotid endarterectomies are presented in a life-table analysis. The mean length of follow-up was 5 years (range 1 to 96 months). During the follow-up period 38 patients who had undergone 39 operations died (mortality rate 30%); three deaths were attributed to cerebral causes (two in-hospital deaths due to intracerebral hemorrhage and one cerebral hemorrhage after 6 months). Restenosis occurred in 25 cases (19%). This restenosis was detected in 5 of 45 men with primary closure (11%), 12 of 17 women with primary closure (70%), 7 of 49 men with patch closure (14%), and 1 of 18 women with patch closure (5.5%). The difference between patch and primary closures was found to be statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.91; p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

开展了一项前瞻性研究,在颈动脉内膜切除术后随机选择进行一期缝合与大隐静脉补片修补。术后初期通过静脉数字减影血管造影对患者进行评估,随后在3个月和6个月时进行双功超声扫描,之后每年检查一次。该系列包括129例颈动脉内膜切除术,其中62例为一期缝合,67例为补片修补术。两组在危险因素、症状以及术后对照数字减影血管造影方面相同。再狭窄定义为双功超声扫描评估直径缩小≥50%的狭窄。特别令人感兴趣的是长期随访时再狭窄的发生以及脑血管症状的出现。对129例颈动脉内膜切除术的随访数据进行了生命表分析。平均随访时间为5年(范围1至96个月)。随访期间,接受39次手术的38例患者死亡(死亡率30%);3例死亡归因于脑部原因(2例因脑出血住院死亡,1例在6个月后发生脑出血)。25例(19%)出现再狭窄。在45例接受一期缝合的男性中有5例(11%)检测到这种再狭窄,17例接受一期缝合的女性中有12例(70%),49例接受补片修补的男性中有7例(14%),18例接受补片修补的女性中有1例(5.5%)。发现补片修补与一期缝合之间的差异具有统计学意义(风险比0.39;95%置信区间0.17至0.91;p = 0.03)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验