• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动脉内膜切除术后的颈动脉狭窄

Carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy.

作者信息

Zierler R E, Bandyk D F, Thiele B L, Strandness D E

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1982 Nov;117(11):1408-15. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380350016003.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380350016003
PMID:7138302
Abstract

Duplex scanning and spectral analysis were used to detect carotid artery stenosis following 89 endarterectomies in 76 patients with a mean postoperative follow-up interval of 16 months. Operative arteriography was used in all cases to verify the technical result. Spectral changes indicating greater than 50%-diameter internal carotid stenosis were observed postoperatively in 32 of the 89 sides. Serial follow-up of 22 stenotic sides showed persistent stenosis in 12, regression of stenosis in nine, and internal carotid occlusion in one. The estimated overall incidence of persistent high-grade stenosis was 19%. Recurrent neurologic symptoms occurred in eight patients. This incidence of postoperative carotid stenosis is higher than estimates based on clinical criteria. The transient nature of some early postoperative stenosis is consistent with proliferation and regression of myointimal lesions in response to arterial injury.

摘要

对76例患者进行了89次颈动脉内膜切除术,术后平均随访16个月,采用双功扫描和频谱分析检测颈动脉狭窄情况。所有病例均采用术中动脉造影来验证手术效果。89侧中,术后观察到频谱变化提示颈内动脉直径狭窄超过50%的有32侧。对22侧狭窄部位进行连续随访,结果显示12侧持续狭窄,9侧狭窄程度减轻,1侧颈内动脉闭塞。持续性重度狭窄的总体发生率估计为19%。8例患者出现复发性神经症状。术后颈动脉狭窄的发生率高于基于临床标准的估计值。术后早期一些狭窄的短暂性与肌内膜病变因动脉损伤而增殖和消退相一致。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy.动脉内膜切除术后的颈动脉狭窄
Arch Surg. 1982 Nov;117(11):1408-15. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380350016003.
2
Residual lesions and early recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. A serial follow-up study with duplex scanning and intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
J Vasc Surg. 1987 May;5(5):731-7. doi: 10.1067/mva.1987.avs0050731.
3
Turbulence occurring after carotid bifurcation endarterectomy: a harbinger of residual and recurrent carotid stenosis.颈动脉内膜切除术后出现的血流紊乱:残余及复发性颈动脉狭窄的先兆。
J Vasc Surg. 1988 Feb;7(2):261-74. doi: 10.1067/mva.1988.avs0070261.
4
Restenosis following carotid endarterectomy. Evaluation by duplex ultrasonography.颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄。经双功超声检查评估。
Arch Surg. 1985 Jun;120(6):678-84. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390300028005.
5
Noninvasive detection of carotid stenosis following endarterectomy.
Arch Surg. 1981 Aug;116(8):1005-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380200019003.
6
Recurrent carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy.动脉内膜切除术后复发性颈动脉狭窄
Ann Surg. 1984 Jul;200(1):74-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198407000-00013.
7
Fate of the carotid artery contralateral to endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术对侧颈动脉的转归
J Vasc Surg. 1990 Feb;11(2):244-50; discussion 250-1. doi: 10.1067/mva.1990.16944.
8
Clinical and technical factors influencing recurrent carotid stenosis and occlusion after endarterectomy.影响颈动脉内膜切除术后复发性狭窄和闭塞的临床及技术因素。
J Vasc Surg. 1987 May;5(5):702-6.
9
Duplex scanning of normal or minimally diseased carotid arteries: correlation with arteriography and clinical outcome.正常或轻度病变颈动脉的双功扫描:与动脉造影及临床结果的相关性
J Vasc Surg. 1990 Oct;12(4):447-54; discussion 454-5.
10
Late follow-up of carotid endarterectomy with venous patch angioplasty.颈动脉内膜切除术联合静脉补片血管成形术的长期随访
Am J Surg. 1991 Jul;162(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90201-n.

引用本文的文献

1
Eversion technique versus traditional carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis.外翻技术与传统颈动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术的比较:一项包含荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的系统评价
Surg Open Sci. 2023 May 23;13:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.05.003. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术时斑块切除术与直接缝合的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD000160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000160.pub4.
3
Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
有症状且严重狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术与直接缝合术的比较:一项对随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;10(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01692-8.
4
The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.颈动脉再狭窄的管理:一项全面综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-963.
5
Eversion technique versus conventional endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in carotid surgery: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.外翻技术与传统颈动脉内膜切除术加补片成形术在颈动脉手术中的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和序贯分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 19;10(4):e030503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030503.
6
Carotid endarterectomy with primary closure versus patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.颈动脉内膜切除术伴原发缝合与补片成形术治疗有症状且狭窄程度显著的患者:系统评价与随机临床试验荟萃分析及序贯试验分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e026419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026419.
7
Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch.右颈动脉-皮肤瘘及右颈动脉假性动脉瘤形成,继发于慢性感染的聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯补片。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2018 Jan-Mar;8(1):48-51. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_62_17.
8
Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.颅外颈动脉疾病的管理
Cardiol Clin. 2015 Feb;33(1):1-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.001.
9
Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: incidence and endovascular management.颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄:发生率及血管内治疗
Interv Neuroradiol. 2007 Dec;13(4):345-52. doi: 10.1177/159101990701300405. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
10
Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的补片血管成形术与一期缝合术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD000160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000160.pub3.