• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管结石的内镜下主要治疗:378例病例回顾。

Primary endoscopic treatment of ureteric calculi. A review of 378 cases.

作者信息

Puppo P, Ricciotti G, Bozzo W, Introini C

机构信息

Department of Urology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):48-52. doi: 10.1159/000019926.

DOI:10.1159/000019926
PMID:10364655
Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

In the post-ESWL period, ureteroscopy represented the solution giving a second choice in the treatment of ureteral calculi in case of failure of extracorporeal lithotripsy. The aim of this study is to review a wide series of ureteral stones in which ureteroscopy combined with endoscopic lithotripsy can be chosen as the first approach for the treatment of ureteral calculi.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and September 1997, 378 patients underwent ureteroscopy and endoscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones with a miniscope associated with either a pneumatic or electropneumatic lithotriptor. Three different miniscopes were used: Olympus (8 Fr), Wolf (7 Fr) and Circon Acmi (7.7 Fr). 238 patients were male and 140 were female. The stones were localized in the upper tract of the ureter in 62 cases (16.4%), 96 (25.3%) in the mid ureter and 220 (58. 3%) in the lower ureter.

RESULTS

A complete stone fragmentation with spontaneous expulsion of the fragments occurred in 354 patients (93.6%). In 22 patients (5.8%) the stones were accidentally pushed up and successfully underwent ESWL. In 38 patients (10%) the fragments were completely removed by basket. A single J polyethylene catheter was placed in 21 (5.5%) and a JJ stent in 147 patients (38. 8%). The operative time ranged from 10 to 60 min, with an average time span of 32. In 22 cases (5.8%) an iterative ureteroscopy for stenosis or incomplete fragmentation was needed. Five cases (1.3%) of ureteral perforation were successfully treated by JJ stent, and only 1 case of ureteral avulsion (upper ureter) was treated by open surgery. In the attempt of overcoming an ureteral stenosis, we had 1 case (0.2%) of ureteral reimplantation. One patient (0.2%) underwent ureterolithotomy for an extremely narrow stenosis just before the ureteropelvic junction. No relevant complication was recorded in the postoperative period. Patients were dismissed after 1- 4 days (average 1.9). Up until now, no case of postoperative ureteral stricture has been observed, although we were not able to carry out a specific follow-up in all our patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy with miniscopes has a high success rate (93.6%) with low morbidity and can be given as a primary approach in the management of ureteral calculi. In the lumbar ureter (especially in women) this technique can represent a good alternative to ESWL in the treatment of obstructing stones (which need stenting) or when the patient asks for a 'one-shot' treatment.

摘要

研究目的

在体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后阶段,输尿管镜检查是在体外碎石失败时治疗输尿管结石的第二选择。本研究的目的是回顾一系列输尿管结石病例,其中输尿管镜联合内镜碎石术可被选作治疗输尿管结石的首选方法。

方法

1994年1月至1997年9月期间,378例患者因输尿管结石接受输尿管镜检查及内镜碎石术,使用与气动或电动气动碎石器相关的微型输尿管镜。使用了三种不同的微型输尿管镜:奥林巴斯(8F)、狼牌(7F)和Circon Acmi(7.7F)。男性患者238例,女性患者140例。结石位于输尿管上段62例(16.4%),中段96例(25.3%),下段220例(58.3%)。

结果

354例患者(93.6%)结石完全碎裂并碎片自然排出。22例患者(5.8%)结石意外上移并成功接受ESWL。38例患者(10%)通过网篮完全取出碎片。21例(5.5%)置入单J型聚乙烯导管,147例患者(38.8%)置入双J支架。手术时间为10至60分钟,平均32分钟。22例(5.8%)因狭窄或碎石不完全需再次进行输尿管镜检查。5例(1.3%)输尿管穿孔通过双J支架成功治疗,仅1例输尿管撕脱(上段输尿管)行开放手术治疗。在试图克服输尿管狭窄时,有1例(0.2%)进行了输尿管再植术。1例患者(0.2%)因输尿管肾盂交界处极度狭窄行输尿管切开取石术。术后无相关并发症记录。患者术后1 - 4天出院(平均1.9天)。到目前为止,尽管未能对所有患者进行具体随访,但未观察到术后输尿管狭窄病例。

结论

微型输尿管镜输尿管镜检查成功率高(93.6%),发病率低,可作为输尿管结石治疗的首选方法。对于腰部输尿管结石(尤其是女性),在治疗梗阻性结石(需要置入支架)或患者要求“一次性”治疗时,该技术可作为ESWL的良好替代方法。

相似文献

1
Primary endoscopic treatment of ureteric calculi. A review of 378 cases.输尿管结石的内镜下主要治疗:378例病例回顾。
Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):48-52. doi: 10.1159/000019926.
2
Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones: only an auxiliary measure of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or a primary therapeutic option?输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石:仅仅是体外冲击波碎石术的辅助措施还是主要治疗选择?
Urol Int. 1997;59(3):177-81. doi: 10.1159/000283057.
3
[Treatment of ureteral calculi: report of 152 calculi].[输尿管结石的治疗:152例结石报告]
Prog Urol. 2000 Feb;10(1):24-8.
4
Primary ureteroscopic treatment for obstructive ureteral stone-causing fornix rupture.原发性输尿管镜治疗致穹窿破裂的梗阻性输尿管结石。
Int J Urol. 2004 Dec;11(12):1058-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00949.x.
5
Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy of impacted ureteral calculi.输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管结石
Int Braz J Urol. 2006 May-Jun;32(3):295-9. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382006000300006.
6
The scope and place of ultrasound-monitored extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in a multimodality setting and the effects of experiential, audit-evoked changes on the management of ureteric calculi.超声监测下体外冲击波碎石术在多模式治疗中的范围及地位,以及经验性、审核引发的变化对输尿管结石治疗的影响。
Br J Urol. 1994 May;73(5):480-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07630.x.
7
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 1999 Nov;36(5):376-9. doi: 10.1159/000020017.
8
[Ambulatory ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy. Our experience after 1803 ureteral stones].[门诊输尿管镜检查及气压弹道碎石术。1803例输尿管结石治疗后的经验]
Arch Esp Urol. 2004 Jun;57(5):539-44.
9
Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.输尿管中下段结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术与激光输尿管镜检查。成本、发病率及有效性的比较
Br J Urol. 1998 Jan;81(1):31-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00510.x.
10
[Transurethral ureteroscopic removal of ureteral calculi].经尿道输尿管镜取石术
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1986 Apr;32(4):533-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Lifetime History of the First Italian Public Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Lithotripter as a Mirror of the Evolution of Endourology over the Last Decade.意大利首例体外冲击波碎石机的终身史:见证过去十年腔内泌尿外科的发展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054127.
2
Evaluation of ureteroscopy outcome in a teaching hospital.教学医院输尿管镜检查结果评估
Turk J Urol. 2016 Sep;42(3):155-61. doi: 10.5152/tud.2016.17037.
3
Antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral urological surgeries: Systematic review.
经尿道泌尿外科手术的抗生素预防:系统评价
Urol Ann. 2013 Apr;5(2):61-74. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.109993.
4
Comparison of a 4.5 F semi-rigid ureteroscope with a 7.5 F rigid ureteroscope in the treatment of ureteral stones in preschool-age children.4.5F半硬性输尿管镜与7.5F硬性输尿管镜治疗学龄前儿童输尿管结石的比较。
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):733-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0489-8. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
5
A retrospective study of ureteroscopy performed at the sultan qaboos hospital, salalah from august 2001 -august 2006.对2001年8月至2006年8月在萨拉拉的苏丹卡布斯医院进行的输尿管镜检查的回顾性研究。
Oman Med J. 2007 Oct;22(3):24-32.
6
Shock wave lithotripsy as a primary modality for treating upper ureteric stones: A 10-year experience.冲击波碎石术作为治疗上段输尿管结石的主要方式:十年经验
Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct;24(4):486-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.44253.
7
Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment?用于治疗大型输尿管结石的气压弹道碎石术:它是一线治疗方法吗?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(3):759-64. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9084-7. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
8
Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管结石。从文献中我们能了解到哪些关于治疗结果和治疗方法的信息?
Urol Res. 2005 Jun;33(3):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0462-x. Epub 2005 May 29.