Davis J R, Morrison A L, Perkins S E, Davis F E, Ochsner M G
Memorial Medical Center, Inc., Savannah, Georgia, USA.
Am Surg. 1999 Jun;65(6):555-9.
Our objective was to determine the impact of abdominal ultrasound (US) on 1) the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and abdominal computed tomography (ACT) for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and on 2) surgical resident training. The study design was a retrospective chart review. Patients sustaining BAT who had ACT or DPL done during the 1-year period before the introduction of US (pre-US) were compared with those from a 1-year period beginning 6 months after US (post-US). Data collected included diagnostic modality, demographic data, mortality, associated injuries, length of stay, mechanism of injury, and number of exploratory laparotomies. Of 128 patients in the pre-US group, 35 patients (27%; P < 0.001) underwent DPL, 0 patients (0%; P < 0.001) received US, and 92 patients (72%) received ACT, with positive results for 31 patients (34%). Exploratory laparotomy was performed on 35 patients (27%) in the pre-US group. Of 140 patients in the post-US group, 8 patients (6%; P < 0.001) underwent DPL, 120 patients (85%; P < 0.001) received US, and 108 patients (77%) received ACT, with positive results for 44 patients (42%). Exploratory laparotomy was performed on 22 patients (15%; P < 0.001) in the post-US group. Resident experience with DPL before and after the introduction of US and availability of US for graduated residents was documented. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Resident experience changed from 22 to 3 DPLs per year in the pre- and post-US groups, respectively. Ten per cent of graduating residents had US available for use after leaving this institution. US replaced DPL and resulted in slightly more positive ACT scans in assessing BAT at our institution. Paradoxically, only 10 per cent of graduating residents had US available after leaving this institution. Until the use of US for diagnosing BAT has widespread use in the community, we must question our adequacy of resident preparation for diagnosing BAT.
我们的目标是确定腹部超声(US)对以下两方面的影响:1)诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)和腹部计算机断层扫描(ACT)在诊断钝性腹部创伤(BAT)中的应用;2)外科住院医师培训。研究设计为回顾性病历审查。将在引入超声(US)之前1年期间(US前)接受ACT或DPL检查的BAT患者与从引入US后6个月开始的1年期间(US后)的患者进行比较。收集的数据包括诊断方式、人口统计学数据、死亡率、相关损伤、住院时间、损伤机制以及剖腹探查术的次数。在US前组的128例患者中,35例患者(27%;P<0.001)接受了DPL,0例患者(0%;P<0.001)接受了US,92例患者(72%)接受了ACT,其中31例患者(34%)结果为阳性。US前组有35例患者(27%)接受了剖腹探查术。在US后组的140例患者中,8例患者(6%;P<0.001)接受了DPL,120例患者(85%;P<0.001)接受了US,108例患者(77%)接受了ACT,其中44例患者(42%)结果为阳性。US后组有22例患者(15%;P<0.001)接受了剖腹探查术。记录了引入US前后住院医师进行DPL的经验以及毕业后住院医师可使用US的情况。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。在US前组和US后组中,住院医师进行DPL的经验分别从每年22次变为3次。10%的毕业住院医师在离开本机构后可使用US。在我们机构评估BAT时,US取代了DPL,并使ACT扫描阳性结果略有增加。矛盾的是,只有10%的毕业住院医师在离开本机构后可使用US。在US用于诊断BAT在社区广泛应用之前,我们必须质疑我们对住院医师诊断BAT的准备是否充分。