• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Role of ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Singh G, Arya N, Safaya R, Bose S M, Das K M, Khanna S K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, PostGraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Injury. 1997 Nov-Dec;28(9-10):667-70. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00152-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00152-6
PMID:9624348
Abstract

Patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) often have equivocal signs of intra-abdominal injury. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has been the 'gold standard' for evaluating these patients, the use of ultrasound (US) being a recent phenomenon. Seventy-three patients with BAT and equivocal physical signs were subjected to both DPL and US for detection of intra-abdominal injury. Based on clinical status, DPL and US findings, the patients underwent laparotomy or non-operative management. DPL was positive in 35 patients. There was one false positive and one false negative result (sensitivity 97.1%, specificity 97.4%, accuracy 97.3%). US was positive in 31 patients. There were 5 false positive and 4 false negative results (sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 88.4%, accuracy 87.7%). Solid viscus injury was documented at laparotomy in 24 patients. DPL failed to detect one pancreatic injury, while US failed to detect 4 splenic and 2 liver injuries. US additionally detected a single case of haemopericardium. Although DPL outperformed US in this study, US can complement DPL in defining the organs injured and in follow up of patients undergoing non-operative management for BAT.

摘要

相似文献

1
Role of ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma.
Injury. 1997 Nov-Dec;28(9-10):667-70. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00152-6.
2
Initial evaluation of children sustaining blunt abdominal trauma: ultrasonography vs. diagnostic peritoneal lavage.钝性腹部创伤患儿的初步评估:超声检查与诊断性腹腔灌洗的比较
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Oct;3(5):278-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1063559.
3
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the management of blunt abdominal trauma: a reassessment.诊断性腹腔灌洗在钝性腹部创伤处理中的应用:重新评估
J Trauma. 1987 Jan;27(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198701000-00001.
4
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma victims.钝性腹部创伤患者的诊断性腹腔灌洗
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;5(2):231-4.
5
Role of ultrasonography, computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in abdominal blunt trauma.超声检查、计算机断层扫描及诊断性腹腔灌洗在腹部钝性创伤中的作用
Saudi Med J. 2002 Nov;23(11):1350-5.
6
Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma?在钝性创伤评估中,超声能否取代诊断性腹腔灌洗?
J Trauma. 1994 Sep;37(3):439-41. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199409000-00018.
7
Diagnostic peritoneal aspiration--the foster child of DPL: a prospective observational study.诊断性腹腔穿刺术——诊断性腹腔灌洗术的“养子”:一项前瞻性观察研究
Int J Surg. 2007 Jun;5(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
8
Prospective comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomographic scanning, and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗、计算机断层扫描和超声检查对钝性腹部创伤诊断的前瞻性比较。
J Trauma. 1993 Aug;35(2):267-70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199308000-00016.
9
Limitations of computed tomography in the evaluation of acute abdominal trauma: a prospective comparison with diagnostic peritoneal lavage.
J Trauma. 1985 Oct;25(10):933-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198510000-00002.
10
Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗与计算机断层扫描在钝性腹部创伤评估中的互补作用。
J Trauma. 2001 Dec;51(6):1128-34; discussion 1134-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00019.