利用大鼠背根神经节体外植体培养模型比较奥沙利铂、奥马铂及其生物转化产物的神经毒性。

Comparative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin, ormaplatin, and their biotransformation products utilizing a rat dorsal root ganglia in vitro explant culture model.

作者信息

Luo F R, Wyrick S D, Chaney S G

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7260, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;44(1):29-38. doi: 10.1007/s002800050941.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Neurotoxicity is one of the major toxicities of platinum-based anticancer drugs, especially oxaliplatin and ormaplatin. It has been postulated that biotransformation products are likely to be responsible for the toxicity of platinum drugs. In our preceding pharmacokinetic study, both oxaliplatin and ormaplatin were observed to produce the same types of major plasma biotransformation products. However, while the plasma concentration of ormaplatin was much lower than that of oxaliplatin at an equimolar dose, one of their common biotransformation products, Pt(dach)Cl2, was present at 29-fold higher concentrations in the plasma following the i.v. injection of ormaplatin than of oxaliplatin. Because ormaplatin has severe neurotoxicity and Pt(dach)Cl2 is very cytotoxic, we have postulated that Pt(dach)Cl2 is likely to be responsible for the differences in neurotoxicity between ormaplatin and oxaliplatin. In order to test this hypothesis, we compared the neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin, ormaplatin, and their biotransformation products. Since the dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) have been suggested to be the likely targtet for platinum drugs and in vitro DRG explant cultures have been suggested to be a valid model for studying cisplatin-associated neurotoxicity, our comparative neurotoxicity study was conducted with DRG explant cultures in vitro.

METHODS

Based on the previous studies of cisplatin neurotoxicity, we established our in vitro DRG explant culture utilizing DRGs dissected from E-19 embryonic rats. Rat DRGs were incubated for 30 min with different platinum compounds to mimic in vivo exposure conditions; this was by followed by a 48-h incubation in culture medium at 37 degrees C. At the end of the incubation, the neurites were fixed and stained with toluidine blue, and neurite outgrowth was quantitated by phase-contrast microscopy. The inhibition of neurite outgrowth by platinum compounds was used as an indicator of in vitro neurotoxicity. Since an in vivo study has indicated that the order of neurotoxicity is ormaplatin > cisplatin > oxaliplatin > carboplatin as measured by morphometric changes to rat DRGs, we initially validated our DRG explant culture model by comparing the in vitro neurotoxicity of ormaplatin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and carboplatin. After observing the same neurotoxicity rank between this study and a previous in vivo study, we further compared the neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin, ormaplatin, and their biotransformation products including Pt(dach)Cl2, Pt(dach)(H2O)Cl, Pt(dach)(H2O)2, Pt(dach)(Met), and Pt(dach)(GSH) utilizing the DRG explant culture model.

RESULTS

Our study indicated that Pt(dach)Cl2 and its hydrolysis products were more potent at inhibiting neurite outgrowth than the parent drugs oxaliplatin and ormaplatin. In contrast, no detectable inhibition of neurite outgrowth was observed for DRGs dosed with Pt(dach)(Met) and Pt(dach)(GSH).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that biotransformation products such as Pt(dach)Cl2 and its hydrolysis products are more neurotoxic than the parent drugs oxaliplatin and ormaplatin. The different neurotoxicity profiles of oxaliplatin and ormaplatin are more likely due to the different plasma concentrations of their common biotransformation product Pt(dach)Cl2 than to differences in their intrinsic neurotoxicity.

摘要

目的

神经毒性是铂类抗癌药物的主要毒性之一,尤其是奥沙利铂和奥马铂。据推测,生物转化产物可能是铂类药物毒性的原因。在我们之前的药代动力学研究中,观察到奥沙利铂和奥马铂都会产生相同类型的主要血浆生物转化产物。然而,在等摩尔剂量下,奥马铂的血浆浓度远低于奥沙利铂,但其常见生物转化产物之一Pt(dach)Cl2在静脉注射奥马铂后的血浆浓度比奥沙利铂高29倍。由于奥马铂具有严重的神经毒性,且Pt(dach)Cl2具有很强的细胞毒性,我们推测Pt(dach)Cl2可能是奥马铂和奥沙利铂神经毒性差异的原因。为了验证这一假设,我们比较了奥沙利铂、奥马铂及其生物转化产物的神经毒性。由于背根神经节(DRG)被认为是铂类药物的可能靶点,且体外DRG外植体培养被认为是研究顺铂相关神经毒性的有效模型,我们在体外DRG外植体培养中进行了比较神经毒性研究。

方法

基于之前对顺铂神经毒性的研究,我们利用从E-19胚胎大鼠分离的DRG建立了体外DRG外植体培养。将大鼠DRG与不同的铂化合物孵育30分钟以模拟体内暴露条件;随后在37℃的培养基中孵育48小时。孵育结束时,将神经突固定并用甲苯胺蓝染色,通过相差显微镜对神经突生长进行定量。铂化合物对神经突生长的抑制用作体外神经毒性的指标。由于一项体内研究表明,通过对大鼠DRG的形态学变化测量,神经毒性顺序为奥马铂>顺铂>奥沙利铂>卡铂,我们最初通过比较奥马铂、顺铂、奥沙利铂和卡铂的体外神经毒性来验证我们的DRG外植体培养模型。在观察到本研究与之前的体内研究具有相同的神经毒性排名后,我们利用DRG外植体培养模型进一步比较了奥沙利铂、奥马铂及其生物转化产物的神经毒性,这些生物转化产物包括Pt(dach)Cl2、Pt(dach)(H2O)Cl、Pt(dach)(H2O)2、Pt(dach)(Met)和Pt(dach)(GSH)。

结果

我们的研究表明,Pt(dach)Cl2及其水解产物比母体药物奥沙利铂和奥马铂更能有效抑制神经突生长。相比之下,用Pt(dach)(Met)和Pt(dach)(GSH)处理的DRG未观察到可检测到的神经突生长抑制。

结论

本研究表明,诸如Pt(dach)Cl2及其水解产物等生物转化产物比母体药物奥沙利铂和奥马铂具有更强的神经毒性。奥沙利铂和奥马铂不同的神经毒性特征更可能是由于它们共同的生物转化产物Pt(dach)Cl2的血浆浓度不同,而不是由于它们内在神经毒性的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索