Suppr超能文献

全胃根治性切除术后 XELOX 与 FOLFOX6 辅助化疗的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of XELOX and FOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy following radical total gastrectomy.

作者信息

Chen Shi, Feng Xingyu, Li Yuanfang, Yuan Xiuhong, Zhou Zhiwei, Chen Yingbo

机构信息

Department of Gastropancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2012 Apr 1;3(4):781-786. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.577. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6) for advanced gastric cancer following total gastrectomy. We performed a retrospective study of 148 gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy from January, 2003 to June, 2009. The follow-up lasted until December, 2010. The Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed to compare the adverse events and prognosis. The total 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 95, 80 and 32%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.273). Similarly, the total incidence of side effects was similar, but each treatment was associated with unique disturbances. The number of patients developing hand-foot syndrome in the XELOX group was far higher compared to the FOLFOX6 group (P=0.000). By contrast, more patients in the FOLFOX6 group suffered from nausea (P=0.024), vomiting (P=0.029), alopecia (P=0.033) and peripheral phlebitis (P=0.004). The total completion rate of the XELOX group was higher compared to the FOLFOX6 group (P=0.015). No significant difference was found in the prognosis of patients receiving XELOX therapy or FOLFOX6 therapy following total gastrectomy. XELOX was, however, more tolerable for patients with total gastrectomy.

摘要

本研究旨在比较卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(XELOX方案)与5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂(FOLFOX6方案)用于全胃切除术后进展期胃癌的疗效和安全性。我们对2003年1月至2009年6月期间接受全胃切除术联合辅助化疗的148例胃癌患者进行了一项回顾性研究。随访持续至2010年12月。采用卡方检验和Kaplan-Meier方法比较不良事件和预后。两组的1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为95%、80%和32%,两组之间无显著差异(P=0.273)。同样,副作用的总发生率相似,但每种治疗都伴有独特的不适。XELOX组发生手足综合征的患者数量远高于FOLFOX6组(P=0.000)。相比之下,FOLFOX6组更多患者出现恶心(P=0.024)、呕吐(P=0.029)、脱发(P=0.033)和外周静脉炎(P=0.004)。XELOX组的总完成率高于FOLFOX6组(P=0.015)。全胃切除术后接受XELOX治疗或FOLFOX6治疗的患者预后无显著差异。然而,XELOX对全胃切除术后的患者更具耐受性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Gastric cancer: surgery in 2011.胃癌:2011 年的手术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):743-58. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0738-7. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
10
Cancer statistics, 2007.2007年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验