Holman R R, Cull C A, Turner R C
Diabetes Research Laboratories, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, U.K.
Diabetes Care. 1999 Jun;22(6):960-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.6.960.
To determine the degree to which alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, with their unique mode of action primarily reducing postprandial hyperglycemia, offer an additional therapeutic approach in the long-term treatment of type 2 diabetes.
We studied 1,946 patients (63% men) who were previously enrolled in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). The patients were randomized to acarbose (n = 973), titrating to a maximum dose of 100 mg three times per day, or to matching placebo (n = 973). Mean +/- SD age was 59 +/- 9 years, body weight 84 +/- 17 kg, diabetes duration 7.6 +/- 2.9 years, median (interquartile range) HbA1c 7.9% (6.7-9.5), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 8.7 mmol/l (6.8-11.1). Fourteen percent of patients were treated with diet alone, 52% with monotherapy, and 34% with combined therapy. Patients were monitored in UKPDS clinics every 4 months for 3 years. The main outcome measures were HbA1c, FPG, body weight, compliance with study medication, incidence of side effects, and frequency of major clinical events.
At 3 years, a lower proportion of patients were taking acarbose compared with placebo (39 vs. 58%, P < 0.0001), the main reasons for noncompliance being flatulence (30 vs. 12%, P < 0.0001) and diarrhea (16 vs. 8%, P < 0.05). Analysis by intention to treat showed that patients allocated to acarbose, compared with placebo, had 0.2% significantly lower median HbA1c at 3 years (P < 0.001). In patients remaining on their allocated therapy, the HbA1c difference at 3 years (309 acarbose, 470 placebo) was 0.5% lower median HbA1c (8.1 vs. 8.6%, P < 0.0001). Acarbose appeared to be equally efficacious when given in addition to diet alone; in addition to monotherapy with a sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin; or in combination with more complex treatment regimens. No significant differences were seen in FPG, body weight, incidence of hypoglycemia, or frequency of major clinical events.
Acarbose significantly improved glycemic control over 3 years in patients with established type 2 diabetes, irrespective of concomitant therapy for diabetes. Careful titration of acarbose is needed in view of the increased noncompliance rate seen secondary to the known side effects.
确定α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂以其主要降低餐后高血糖的独特作用方式,在2型糖尿病长期治疗中提供额外治疗方法的程度。
我们研究了1946例患者(63%为男性),这些患者先前参加了英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)。患者被随机分为阿卡波糖组(n = 973),滴定至最大剂量每日3次,每次100 mg,或匹配的安慰剂组(n = 973)。平均±标准差年龄为59±9岁,体重84±17 kg,糖尿病病程7.6±2.9年,HbA1c中位数(四分位间距)为7.9%(6.7 - 9.5),空腹血糖(FPG)为8.7 mmol/l(6.8 - 11.1)。14%的患者仅接受饮食治疗,52%接受单一疗法,34%接受联合疗法。患者在UKPDS诊所每4个月监测一次,为期3年。主要结局指标为HbA1c、FPG、体重、研究药物依从性、副作用发生率及主要临床事件发生频率。
3年后,与安慰剂组相比,服用阿卡波糖的患者比例更低(39%对58%,P < 0.0001),不依从的主要原因是肠胃胀气(30%对12%,P < 0.0001)和腹泻(16%对8%,P < 0.05)。意向性分析表明,与安慰剂组相比,分配到阿卡波糖组的患者在3年后HbA1c中位数显著低0.2%(P < 0.001)。在继续接受分配治疗的患者中,3年后(309例阿卡波糖组,470例安慰剂组)HbA1c差异为中位数低0.5%(8.1%对8.6%,P < 0.0001)。阿卡波糖在仅饮食治疗基础上、在磺脲类、二甲双胍或胰岛素单一疗法基础上、或在更复杂治疗方案联合使用时似乎同样有效。在FPG、体重、低血糖发生率或主要临床事件发生频率方面未观察到显著差异。
阿卡波糖在3年时间里显著改善了已确诊2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制,无论糖尿病的伴随治疗如何。鉴于已知副作用导致的不依从率增加,需要谨慎滴定阿卡波糖剂量。