Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Predel H G, Graf C, Rost R
Institut für Kreislaufforschung und Sportmedizin der Deutschen Sporthochschule Köln.
Herz. 1999 Apr;24 Suppl 1:9-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03042127.
From January 1992 until December 1994 the Cologne model of ambulant cardiac rehabilitation (ACR) in the greater area of Cologne, Germany, was performed and is still in progress. In Germany until 1992 the cardiac rehabilitation was exclusively performed stationary. The objective of the "Cologne model" was to evaluate, whether the transfer of the stationary cardiac rehabilitation programs into the ambulatory setting is achievable without deficits in efficiency, safety and overall quality. The results obtained are intended to serve for standardization and quality control of future ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation programs in Germany. From 1992 to 1994 108 patients (94 men, 14 women; 52.3 +/- 8.0 years old) with coronary artery disease (CAD) which were compatible with the criteria of the "Cologne model" (Table 1) participated in the 4-week ACR. The indications for inclusion into the ACR were in 74 cases a myocardial infarction (MI), in 34 cases CAD without MI, but with PTCA/stent-procedure (Table 3). Seven patients discontinued the ACR prematurely, 2 patients because of cardiovascular reasons. Reasons for the preference of the ambulatory over a stationary cardiac rehabilitation program were in 40.6% of the patients refusal of "hospital ambience", in 43.6% familiar or in 12.9% professional reasons. During the 4-week ACR patients participated in a mean of 72.9 +/- 6.7 hours of therapy (Table 4). As a result of the ACR exercise tolerance increased highly significantly () from 116.4 +/- 28.8 to 129.9 +/- 34.6 watt). This improvement was maintained at the 1- and 3-year control (128.7 +/- 35.8) examinations (Tables 5 and 7). One year after ACR 77% of the patients stated to be physically active in ambulatory heart groups (AHG) (27.6%) or on their own (49.4%). Three years after ACR the rate of regularly physically active patients still was 59.2%. Furthermore, as a result of ACR the dietary behavior was changed significantly. There was a reduction in the consumption of lipids by 20.8%, saturated fatty acids by 30.7% and of cholesterol by 30.5%. The plasma concentrations of cholesterol decreased from 231 +/- 49.8 to 213.2 +/- 35.9 mg%. Six (and 12) months after ACR they increased again to 225.6 +/- 39.4 mg%. Three years after ACR the mean cholesterol level was 219.1 +/- 39.3 mg%. In the high risk group (cholesterol at the initial visit > 220 mg%) cholesterol levels were reduced from 266 +/- 44 to 232 +/- 31.9 mg%. Six and 12 months after ACR they were 239.7 +/- 35.8 mg% and 245.8 +/- 32.6 mg%, respectively, (Tables 6 and 7) and still significantly lower than before ACR, though only 19% of the patients were treated with lipid lowering agents. Three years after ACR cholesterol were 234.6 +/- 37.7 mg%** in the high-risk group. 34.2% of the patients received lipid lowering agents. Mean body weight remained unaltered over the 3-year period. Smoking behavior was not altered significantly during the 4-week ACR. However, before the cardiovascular event 67.3% of the patients had smoked cigarettes. At the beginning and at the end of ACR 20.8% of the patients still smoked. During the ACR the number of smoked cigarettes was reduced significantly from 32.4 +/- 15.2 to 6.9 +/- 5.2 cigarettes per day. One year after ACR 23% of the patients were smokers, 3 years after ACR the percentage of smokers increased to 30.3%. Before ACR 73.3% of the patients were still working. During the first 6 months after ACR 68.2% returned to work and the percentage increased to 73% in the following 6 months. The results demonstrate that it is achievable to transfer the contents of the established stationary cardiac rehabilitation programs into the ambulatory setting without loss of efficiency, safety and overall quality. It is further confirmed, that it is necessary to continuously evaluate the results of the cardiac rehabilitation program on a long-term basis. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
从1992年1月至1994年12月,德国科隆大区实施了门诊心脏康复(ACR)的科隆模式,目前该模式仍在进行中。在德国,直到1992年心脏康复都仅在住院条件下进行。“科隆模式”的目标是评估是否能够将既定的住院心脏康复项目内容转移到门诊环境中,同时不影响效率、安全性和整体质量。所获得的结果旨在为德国未来门诊心脏康复项目的标准化和质量控制提供参考。1992年至1994年,108例符合“科隆模式”标准(表1)的冠心病(CAD)患者(94例男性,14例女性;年龄52.3±8.0岁)参加了为期4周的ACR。纳入ACR的指征为:74例为心肌梗死(MI),34例为无MI但接受过PTCA/支架置入术的CAD(表3)。7例患者提前终止了ACR,2例因心血管原因。患者选择门诊而非住院心脏康复项目的原因中,40.6%是拒绝“医院环境”,因熟悉或职业原因分别占43.6%和12.9%。在为期4周的ACR期间,患者平均接受了72.9±6.7小时的治疗(表4)。ACR的结果显示,运动耐量从116.4±28.8瓦显著提高()至129.9±34.6瓦。这种改善在1年和3年的随访检查中得以维持(128.7±35.8)(表5和7)。ACR后1年,77%的患者表示在门诊心脏小组(AHG)(27.6%)或自行(49.4%)进行体育活动。ACR后3年,定期进行体育活动的患者比例仍为59.2%。此外,ACR还使饮食行为发生了显著变化。脂质摄入量减少了20.8%,饱和脂肪酸减少了30.7%,胆固醇减少了30.5%。血浆胆固醇浓度从231±49.8降至213.2±35.9mg%。ACR后6(和12)个月,又升至225.6±39.4mg%。ACR后3年,平均胆固醇水平为219.1±39.3mg%。在高危组(初诊时胆固醇>220mg%),胆固醇水平从266±44降至232±३१.९mg%。ACR后6个月和12个月分别为239.7±35.8mg%和245.8±32.6mg%(表6和7),尽管只有19%的患者接受了降脂药物治疗,但仍显著低于ACR前。ACR后3年,高危组胆固醇水平为234.6±37.7mg%**。34.2%的患者接受了降脂药物治疗。3年期间平均体重保持不变。在为期4周的ACR期间,吸烟行为没有显著改变。然而,在心血管事件发生前,67.3%的患者吸烟。ACR开始时和结束时,仍有20.8%的患者吸烟。在ACR期间,每天吸烟支数从32.4±15.2显著减少至6.9±5.2支。ACR后1年,23%的患者吸烟,ACR后3年,吸烟者比例增至30.3%。ACR前,由73.3%的患者仍在工作。ACR后的前6个月,68.2%的患者恢复工作,在接下来的6个月中这一比例增至73%。结果表明,将既定的住院心脏康复项目内容转移到门诊环境中,同时不损失效率、安全性和整体质量是可行的。进一步证实,有必要长期持续评估心脏康复项目的结果。(摘要截选)