• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术实际需要多长时间?从1000例腹腔镜手术中获得的经验教训。

How long does laparoscopic surgery really take? Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies.

作者信息

Shushan A, Mohamed H, Magos A L

机构信息

University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1999 Jan;14(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.39.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.1.39
PMID:10374091
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the operating time of the most common gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. We analysed retrospectively 1000 consecutive operative laparoscopies on a procedure-by-procedure basis. Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic sterilization were specifically excluded from the analysis. The various laparoscopic procedures were grouped and analysed under six major categories. The average operating time for all cases was 76.9 min (range 10-400). In 38 cases (3.8%) the laparoscopic procedure was converted to laparotomy. The average operating time for treating ectopic pregnancy and tubal disease was approximately 60 min (range 13-240). Surgery for endometriosis and ovarian cysts averaged 72 min (range 10-240). Laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy averaged 113 and 131 min respectively (range 25-400). Our results show that while the operating time for most operative laparoscopies is less than 75 min, the range of operating times is great. The relative lack of predictability in procedure times means that the efficient utilization of fixed theatre sessions is difficult.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估最常见的妇科腹腔镜手术的手术时间。我们对1000例连续的手术腹腔镜检查按手术逐个进行了回顾性分析。诊断性腹腔镜检查和腹腔镜绝育术被明确排除在分析之外。各种腹腔镜手术被分为六大类并进行分析。所有病例的平均手术时间为76.9分钟(范围为10 - 400分钟)。38例(3.8%)腹腔镜手术转为开腹手术。治疗异位妊娠和输卵管疾病的平均手术时间约为60分钟(范围为13 - 240分钟)。子宫内膜异位症和卵巢囊肿手术平均为72分钟(范围为10 - 240分钟)。腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术的平均时间分别为113分钟和131分钟(范围为25 - 400分钟)。我们的结果表明,虽然大多数手术腹腔镜检查的手术时间少于75分钟,但手术时间范围很大。手术时间相对缺乏可预测性意味着难以有效利用固定的手术室时段。

相似文献

1
How long does laparoscopic surgery really take? Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies.腹腔镜手术实际需要多长时间?从1000例腹腔镜手术中获得的经验教训。
Hum Reprod. 1999 Jan;14(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.39.
2
A case-control study to compare the variability of operating time in laparoscopic and open surgery.
Hum Reprod. 1999 Jun;14(6):1467-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1467.
3
Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.机器人手术在复杂妇科疾病中的应用:台湾三军总医院的经验。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;51(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.005.
4
Modern surgical approaches to female reproductive tract.
Hum Reprod Update. 1996 Sep-Oct;2(5):419-27. doi: 10.1093/humupd/2.5.419.
5
Breaking new ground or just digging a hole? An evaluation of gynecologic operative laparoscopy.
J Gynecol Surg. 1992 Fall;8(3):143-58. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1992.8.143.
6
The modern role of reproductive surgery.生殖外科的现代作用。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;54(4):710-9. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182353d86.
7
Laparoscopic surgery of the fallopian tubes and ovaries.输卵管和卵巢的腹腔镜手术。
Semin Laparosc Surg. 1999 Jun;6(2):58-67. doi: 10.1053/SLAS00600058.
8
Endoscopic infertility surgery.内镜不孕手术
J Reprod Med. 1989 Feb;34(2):127-34.
9
[150 cases of vedio-laparoscopic gynecologic surgery].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1994 Apr;74(4):206-8, 253.
10
[Celiosurgery in gynecology. Indications, benefits and risks].
Ann Chir. 1994;48(7):618-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of laparoscopic surgery in managing hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients: a single level I trauma center, propensity score matching study.腹腔镜手术在稳定血流动力学的腹部创伤患者中的作用:单一级别 I 创伤中心,倾向评分匹配研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2517-2525. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02642-4. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Impact of surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery among paediatric appendicitis patients: A meta-analysis.开放和腹腔镜手术治疗小儿阑尾炎患者术后手术部位感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14524. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14524. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response-A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial.
微创手术期间主动和被动间歇对上肢体力负荷和体力应激反应的影响——一项对照、随机交叉、实验室试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5975-5988. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10042-9. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Learning laparoscopic hysterectomy: analysis of different surgeons' individual learning curves.学习腹腔镜子宫切除术:不同外科医生个体学习曲线分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1065-1072. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06893-7. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
5
A dual-view multi-resolution laparoscope for safer and more efficient minimally invasive surgery.一种用于更安全、更高效的微创手术的双重视野多分辨率腹腔镜。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23021-2.
6
s-CAM: An Untethered Insertable Laparoscopic Surgical Camera Robot with Non-Contact Actuation.s-CAM:一种无绳可插入腹腔镜手术摄像机器人,采用非接触式驱动。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 29;22(9):3405. doi: 10.3390/s22093405.
7
Surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童开腹手术和腹腔镜手术后的手术部位感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Aug;37(8):973-981. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04911-4. Epub 2021 May 1.
8
Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial.主动和被动工作休息在腹腔镜外科医生模拟腹腔镜手术中的应用:一项对照、随机交叉实验室试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):e038952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038952.
9
Single-port laparoscopic neosalpingostomy for hydrosalpinx.单孔腹腔镜下输卵管积水造口术
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Jul-Sep;6(3):116-119. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
10
First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device.THE AUTOLAP™ 系统的首次体验:一种基于图像的机器人摄像转向设备。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2560-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5957-3. Epub 2017 Nov 3.