• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

THE AUTOLAP™ 系统的首次体验:一种基于图像的机器人摄像转向设备。

First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device.

机构信息

Deparment of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2560-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5957-3. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5957-3
PMID:29101564
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic camera holders for endoscopic surgery have been available for 20 years but market penetration is low. The current camera holders are controlled by voice, joystick, eyeball tracking, or head movements, and this type of steering has proven to be successful but excessive disturbance of surgical workflow has blocked widespread introduction. The Autolap™ system (MST, Israel) uses a radically different steering concept based on image analysis. This may improve acceptance by smooth, interactive, and fast steering. These two studies were conducted to prove safe and efficient performance of the core technology.

METHODS

A total of 66 various laparoscopic procedures were performed with the AutoLap™ by nine experienced surgeons, in two multi-center studies; 41 cholecystectomies, 13 fundoplications including hiatal hernia repair, 4 endometriosis surgeries, 2 inguinal hernia repairs, and 6 (bilateral) salpingo-oophorectomies. The use of the AutoLap™ system was evaluated in terms of safety, image stability, setup and procedural time, accuracy of imaged-based movements, and user satisfaction.

RESULTS

Surgical procedures were completed with the AutoLap™ system in 64 cases (97%). The mean overall setup time of the AutoLap™ system was 4 min (04:08 ± 0.10). Procedure times were not prolonged due to the use of the system when compared to literature average. The reported user satisfaction was 3.85 and 3.96 on a scale of 1 to 5 in two studies. More than 90% of the image-based movements were accurate. No system-related adverse events were recorded while using the system.

CONCLUSION

Safe and efficient use of the core technology of the AutoLap™ system was demonstrated with high image stability and good surgeon satisfaction. The results support further clinical studies that will focus on usability, improved ergonomics and additional image-based features.

摘要

背景

用于内窥镜手术的机器人摄像头支架已经问世 20 年,但市场渗透率仍然很低。目前的摄像头支架可以通过语音、操纵杆、眼球追踪或头部运动来控制,这种转向方式已经被证明是成功的,但由于对手术流程的干扰过大,因此无法广泛推广。Autolap™系统(以色列 MST 公司)采用的是一种基于图像分析的全新转向理念。这种方式可能会提高接受度,实现流畅、互动和快速的转向。这两项研究旨在证明其核心技术的安全和高效性能。

方法

共有 9 名经验丰富的外科医生在两项多中心研究中使用 Autolap™进行了总共 66 例不同的腹腔镜手术;其中 41 例胆囊切除术、13 例胃底折叠术(包括食管裂孔疝修复术)、4 例子宫内膜异位症手术、2 例腹股沟疝修补术和 6 例(双侧)输卵管卵巢切除术。从安全性、图像稳定性、设置和手术时间、基于图像的运动的准确性以及用户满意度等方面评估 Autolap™系统的使用情况。

结果

64 例(97%)手术均成功完成。Autolap™系统的总设置时间平均为 4 分钟(04:08 ± 0.10)。与文献平均水平相比,使用该系统并未延长手术时间。两项研究中,报告的用户满意度分别为 3.85 和 3.96(满分 5 分)。超过 90%的基于图像的运动是准确的。使用该系统时未记录到任何与系统相关的不良事件。

结论

证明了 Autolap™系统的核心技术安全且高效,具有高图像稳定性和良好的医生满意度。研究结果支持进一步的临床研究,重点关注可用性、改进的人体工程学和其他基于图像的功能。

相似文献

1
First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device.THE AUTOLAP™ 系统的首次体验:一种基于图像的机器人摄像转向设备。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2560-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5957-3. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial.手持和机器人辅助摄像控制中的工效学:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3919-3925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06678-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Efficiency in image-guided robotic and conventional camera steering: a prospective randomized controlled trial.图像引导机器人与传统摄像头操控的效率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2334-2340. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08508-9. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Image-based laparoscopic camera steering versus conventional steering: a comparison study.基于图像的腹腔镜摄像转向与传统转向:对比研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1157-1163. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01342-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery?机器人摄像头辅助:腹腔镜和胸腔镜手术的未来?
Surg Innov. 2018 Oct;25(5):485-491. doi: 10.1177/1553350618784224. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.机器人手臂增强功能,以适应复杂的微创手术中提高效率和降低资源利用的需求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:471-81.
7
A Robotic Camera Holder Controlled by Head Movements: Exploring This New Robot-Surgeon Interface.头部运动控制的机械摄像臂:探索这种新型机器人-外科医生界面。
Surg Innov. 2020 Oct;27(5):499-506. doi: 10.1177/1553350620916573. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合操纵杆引导式摄像设备:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy.独立式机械臂摄像固定系统评估:改善腹腔镜技术的新科技
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Mar;31(3):404-409. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1806078. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
Comparison of robotic camera holders with human assistants in endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人摄像持镜臂与人类助手在内镜手术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2023 Aug;32(4):153-162. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2199332. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review.手术系统中驱动式内镜操作的用户界面:范围界定综述。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4193-4223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09981-0. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Development and Validation of a Model for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Instrument Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Network-Based Instance Segmentation and Videos of Laparoscopic Procedures.基于卷积神经网络实例分割和腹腔镜手术视频的腹腔镜结直肠手术器械识别模型的开发和验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2226265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26265.
3
Robotic Endoscope Control Via Autonomous Instrument Tracking.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Laparoscopic Lens Contamination in Operating Theaters: A Study on the Frequency and Duration of Lens Contamination and Commonly Utilized Techniques to Maintain Clear Vision.手术室中腹腔镜镜头污染的影响:关于镜头污染频率、持续时间及常用保持视野清晰技术的研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Aug;26(4):286-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000289.
2
An interactive method for achieving ergonomically optimum conditions during laparoscopic surgery.一种在腹腔镜手术期间实现人体工程学最佳条件的交互式方法。
J Robot Surg. 2013 Jun;7(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0353-4. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
3
Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.
通过自主器械跟踪实现机器人内窥镜控制。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Apr 11;9:832208. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.832208. eCollection 2022.
4
Artificial intelligence-based computer vision in surgery: Recent advances and future perspectives.基于人工智能的计算机视觉在手术中的应用:最新进展与未来展望。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Oct 8;6(1):29-36. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12513. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis.自主式机器人腹腔镜肠吻合术。
Sci Robot. 2022 Jan 26;7(62):eabj2908. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908.
6
Image-based laparoscopic camera steering versus conventional steering: a comparison study.基于图像的腹腔镜摄像转向与传统转向:对比研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1157-1163. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01342-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
Automating Endoscope Motion in Robotic Surgery: A Usability Study on da Vinci-Assisted Neobladder Reconstruction.机器人手术中内窥镜运动的自动化:达芬奇辅助新膀胱重建的可用性研究
Front Robot AI. 2021 Nov 25;8:707704. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.707704. eCollection 2021.
8
Efficiency in image-guided robotic and conventional camera steering: a prospective randomized controlled trial.图像引导机器人与传统摄像头操控的效率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2334-2340. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08508-9. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
A learning robot for cognitive camera control in minimally invasive surgery.用于微创手术中认知相机控制的学习机器人。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5365-5374. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08509-8. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
10
Adaptive Fusion-Based Autonomous Laparoscope Control for Semi-Autonomous Surgery.基于自适应融合的半自动手术腹腔镜自主控制
J Med Syst. 2019 Nov 23;44(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1460-9.
同时使用机器人子宫操纵器和机器人腹腔镜固定器以实现无助手单人腹腔镜检查:双ViKY。
J Robot Surg. 2015 Sep;9(3):211-3. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0518-z. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of outcomes and costs between early and delayed cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:早期和延迟胆囊切除术的结局和成本比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Dec;18(2 Suppl):40-6.
5
Initial experience with the EndoAssist camera-holding robot in laparoscopic urological surgery.EndoAssist持镜机器人在腹腔镜泌尿外科手术中的初步经验。
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0010-5. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
6
Laparoscopic anterior versus posterior fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.腹腔镜下前位与后位胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
World J Surg. 2015 Apr;39(4):981-96. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2889-0.
7
Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合操纵杆引导式摄像设备:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
8
Evaluation of active camera control systems in gynecological surgery: construction, handling, comfort, surgeries and results.妇科手术中主动式摄像控制系统的评估:构造、操作、舒适性、手术及结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3004-8.
9
Ergonomics principles associated with laparoscopic surgeon injury/illness.与腹腔镜外科医生损伤/疾病相关的人体工程学原则。
Hum Factors. 2012 Dec;54(6):1087-92. doi: 10.1177/0018720812451046.
10
Comparison of the FreeHand® robotic camera holder with human assistants during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.比较徒手机器人摄像臂与助手在经腹腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的应用。
BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(6):970-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09656.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.