Jiang B C, White J M
College of Optometry, University of Houston, Texas 77204-6052, USA.
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 May;76(5):295-302. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00017.
Prolonged near work is considered to be an environmental factor leading to the development of late-onset myopia. Accommodation may be the specific mechanism underlying the association between near work and late-onset myopia. To determine whether late-onset myopes have abnormal accommodation, we compared accommodative static responses and dynamic facilities before and after a near task in two groups of subjects, emmetropes and late-onset myopes.
In experiment 1, the accommodative stimulus/response function with monocular viewing and the dark focus (the accommodative response in the dark) were objectively measured with a Canon R-1 infrared optometer before (preadaptation) and after (postadaptation) a 20-min near task. In experiment 2, monocular accommodative facility (AF) and dark focus were measured before and after the near task. Facility was measured as the subjective time needed to clear an accommodative target (20/40 letters) at 40 cm through +/-2.00 D lenses. The time between when the subject flipped the lenses from viewing through the +2.00 D to the -2.00 D lenses was recorded by a computer.
In both experiments, inward shifts of the dark focus were observed after the near task. In experiment 1, after the near task, static accommodative responses also showed a small but statistically significant inward shift. Neither postadaptation effect differed between refractive groups. The only difference between groups was that late-onset myopes had a lower slope of the accommodative stimulus/response function, both pre- and postadaptation. In experiment 2, both refractive groups showed the same results. After the near task, the duration for accommodation from near to far (relaxation) increased but the duration for accommodation from far to near (stimulation) did not change.
Late-onset myopes have shallower accommodative stimulus/response functions. As suggested in a previous study, this may be due to their reduced sensitivity to defocus. In both emmetropes and late-onset myopes, the near task causes an increase in static accommodative responses. Although our results show it to be a small increase, it is consistent with predictions of Hung and Semmlow's model of accommodation. In both emmetropes and late-onset myopes, the near task also increases the duration for relaxing accommodation, but not for stimulating accommodation. This suggests there are two subsystems which may adapt to prolonged accommodation differently.
长时间的近距工作被认为是导致迟发性近视发展的一个环境因素。调节可能是近距工作与迟发性近视之间关联的具体机制。为了确定迟发性近视患者是否存在异常调节,我们比较了正视者和迟发性近视患者两组在近距任务前后的调节静态反应和动态调节能力。
在实验1中,使用佳能R - 1红外验光仪在20分钟近距任务前(预适应)和后(后适应)客观测量单眼观察时的调节刺激/反应函数以及暗焦点(黑暗中的调节反应)。在实验2中,测量近距任务前后的单眼调节灵活度(AF)和暗焦点。调节灵活度通过计算机记录受试者通过±2.00D镜片在40cm处看清一个调节目标(20/40字母)所需的主观时间来测量。当受试者将镜片从通过 +2.00D镜片观察翻转到 -2.00D镜片观察之间的时间由计算机记录。
在两个实验中,近距任务后均观察到暗焦点向内偏移。在实验1中,近距任务后,静态调节反应也显示出虽小但具有统计学意义的向内偏移。屈光组之间的后适应效应没有差异。两组之间唯一的差异是迟发性近视患者在预适应和后适应时调节刺激/反应函数的斜率均较低。在实验2中,两个屈光组显示出相同的结果。近距任务后,从近到远(放松)的调节持续时间增加,但从远到近(刺激)的调节持续时间没有变化。
迟发性近视患者的调节刺激/反应函数较浅。如先前一项研究中所提示的,这可能是由于他们对离焦的敏感性降低。在正视者和迟发性近视患者中,近距任务都会导致静态调节反应增加。尽管我们的结果显示增加幅度较小,但这与Hung和Semmlow的调节模型预测一致。在正视者和迟发性近视患者中,近距任务还会增加放松调节的持续时间,但不会增加刺激调节的持续时间。这表明存在两个子系统,它们可能以不同方式适应长时间的调节。