Cuenca-Estrella M, Ruiz-Díez B, Martínez-Suárez J V, Monzón A, Rodríguez-Tudela J L
Unidad de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Jan;43(1):149-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.1.149.
We report the in-vitro susceptibility of 27 clinical isolates of Scedosporium apiospermum and 43 of Scedosporium prolificans. S. apiospermum was resistant to fluconazole and flucytosine, with variable susceptibility to amphotericin B, itraconazole, ketoconazole and susceptible to miconazole. Voriconazole was much more active than fluconazole and flucytosine, more active than amphotericin B, itraconazole and ketoconazole and was as active as miconazole against S. apiospermum isolates. Voriconazole and the other six antifungal agents showed low activity against S. prolificans isolates.
我们报告了27株尖端赛多孢菌临床分离株和43株多育赛多孢菌临床分离株的体外药敏情况。尖端赛多孢菌对氟康唑和氟胞嘧啶耐药,对两性霉素B、伊曲康唑、酮康唑敏感性各异,对咪康唑敏感。伏立康唑对尖端赛多孢菌分离株的活性远高于氟康唑和氟胞嘧啶,高于两性霉素B、伊曲康唑和酮康唑,与咪康唑相当。伏立康唑和其他六种抗真菌药对多育赛多孢菌分离株活性较低。