Suppr超能文献

幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗前抗生素耐药性:三项随机对照研究的结果

Pretreatment antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori infection: results of three randomized controlled studies.

作者信息

Realdi G, Dore M P, Piana A, Atzei A, Carta M, Cugia L, Manca A, Are B M, Massarelli G, Mura I, Maida A, Graham D Y

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Sassari, Italy.

出版信息

Helicobacter. 1999 Jun;4(2):106-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.1999.99002.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although combinations of antibiotics and antisecretory drugs are useful for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, treatment failure is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between pretreatment antibiotic resistance and outcome by using six different treatment regimens for H. pylori infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred sixty-nine consecutive H. pylori-infected patients with dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled in three consecutive randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trials: trial A, 128 patients; trial B, 125 patients; trial C, 116 patients. Treatments consisted of (A) a 15-day course of dual therapy (omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid) (OA vs OC); (B) a 7-day triple therapy of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1,000 mg bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid (OMA vs OMC); or (C) omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, plus tetracycline, 500 mg qid, or doxycycline, 100 mg tid (OMT vs OMD). Diagnostic endoscopy was made in all patients before and 5 to 6 weeks after therapy. Six biopsies were taken from each patient for histology, rapid urease test, and H. pylori culture; antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the E-test method.

RESULTS

Overall cure rates were poor for both dual therapies OA and OC (38% and 37%, respectively) and for triple therapies OMA, OMC, and OMD (57%, 55%, and 58%, respectively). The OMT combination was successful in 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4%-97%). Metronidazole resistance was present in 29.7% (95% CI, 24%-35%), amoxicillin resistance was present in 26% (95% CI, 21%-32%), clarithromycin resistance was present in 23.1% (95% CI, 18%-29%), tetracycline resistance was present in 14% (95% CI, 10%-20%), and doxycycline resistance was present in 33.3% (95% CI, 21%-47%). Antibiotic resistance markedly reduced the cure rates and accounted for most of the poor results with the triple therapies: 89% versus 23%; 77% versus 26%; 100% versus 60%; and 67% versus 23% for OMC, OMA, OMT, and OMD, respectively. OMT appeared to be the best because of the high success rate with metronidazole-resistant H. pylori (71%) and in low-level tetracycline resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment antibiotic-resistant H. pylori can, in part, explain the low cure rate of the infection and the variability in outcome in reported trials.

摘要

背景

尽管抗生素与抗分泌药物联合使用对幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗有效,但治疗失败很常见。本研究的目的是通过使用六种不同的幽门螺杆菌感染治疗方案来评估治疗前抗生素耐药性与治疗结果之间的关系。

患者与方法

369例连续的有消化不良症状的幽门螺杆菌感染患者被纳入三项连续的随机、对照、单中心临床试验:试验A,128例患者;试验B,125例患者;试验C,116例患者。治疗方案包括:(A)为期15天的双联疗法(奥美拉唑,20毫克,每日两次,阿莫西林,1克,每日两次,或克拉霉素,500毫克,每日三次)(OA对比OC);(B)为期7天的三联疗法,即奥美拉唑,20毫克,每日两次,加甲硝唑,500毫克,每日两次,和阿莫西林,1000毫克,每日两次,或克拉霉素,500毫克,每日三次(OMA对比OMC);或(C)奥美拉唑,20毫克,每日两次,加甲硝唑,500毫克,每日两次,加四环素,500毫克,每日四次,或强力霉素,100毫克,每日三次(OMT对比OMD)。所有患者在治疗前及治疗后5至6周进行诊断性内镜检查。从每位患者身上取六份活检组织进行组织学检查、快速尿素酶试验和幽门螺杆菌培养;使用E-test法进行抗生素敏感性试验。

结果

双联疗法OA和OC的总体治愈率都很低(分别为38%和37%),三联疗法OMA、OMC和OMD的总体治愈率也很低(分别为57%、55%和58%)。OMT组合的成功率为91%(95%置信区间[CI],80.4%-97%)。甲硝唑耐药率为29.7%(95%CI,24%-35%),阿莫西林耐药率为26%(95%CI,21%-32%),克拉霉素耐药率为23.1%(95%CI,18%-29%),四环素耐药率为14%(95%CI,10%-20%),强力霉素耐药率为33.3%(95%CI,21%-47%)。抗生素耐药性显著降低了治愈率,并且是三联疗法治疗效果不佳的主要原因:OMC、OMA、OMT和OMD的治愈率分别为89%对23%;77%对26%;100%对60%;67%对23%。由于对甲硝唑耐药的幽门螺杆菌成功率高(71%)且四环素耐药水平低,OMT似乎是最佳方案。

结论

治疗前抗生素耐药的幽门螺杆菌可部分解释感染的低治愈率以及报道试验中治疗结果的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验