Suppr超能文献

咳嗽压力测试在尿失禁评估中的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Swift S E, Yoon E A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;94(1):99-102. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00314-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in women who present with complaints of urinary incontinence.

METHODS

This prospective observational study involved 50 women between the ages of 28 and 78 years with primary complaints of urinary incontinence. All subjects underwent a pelvic examination, cystometrogram, and a cough stress test. The cough stress test was performed in the standing position at a bladder volume of 300 mL or at maximum cystometric capacity if it was less than 300 mL. The results of the cough stress test were recorded as positive if urine loss occurred with a cough or as negative if no urine loss was seen and the bladder volume was recorded. The women returned in 1-4 weeks for a second cough stress test performed at the same bladder volume as at the initial examination.

RESULTS

Of the 50 women studied, 45 (90%) had similar results with both cough stress tests. Thirty-five had a positive cough stress test on the initial examination, and 32 of these patients (91%) also had a positive cough stress test at a repeat visit. Fifteen patients had a negative initial cough stress test, and 13 of these 15 (87%) had a negative cough stress test on repeat examination. All 20 patients diagnosed as having pure genuine stress incontinence had a positive cough stress test on initial and repeat examinations. Of the 15 patients diagnosed with detrusor instability or sensory urge incontinence, 13 (86%) had negative cough stress tests on initial and repeat examinations. Of the 15 patients diagnosed with mixed incontinence, 12 (80%) had positive cough stress tests on initial and repeat examinations.

CONCLUSION

The cough stress test appears to be a reliable test. The reliability is more consistent in women with a diagnosis of pure genuine stress incontinence.

摘要

目的

确定咳嗽压力试验在主诉尿失禁女性中的重测信度。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了50名年龄在28至78岁之间、主诉为尿失禁的女性。所有受试者均接受了盆腔检查、膀胱测压和咳嗽压力试验。咳嗽压力试验在站立位进行,膀胱容量为300 mL时进行,若膀胱容量小于300 mL,则在最大膀胱测压容量时进行。咳嗽压力试验结果若咳嗽时出现尿液漏出则记录为阳性,若未观察到尿液漏出且记录了膀胱容量则记录为阴性。这些女性在1 - 4周后返回,进行第二次咳嗽压力试验,试验时膀胱容量与初次检查时相同。

结果

在研究的50名女性中,45名(90%)两次咳嗽压力试验结果相似。初次检查时35名咳嗽压力试验为阳性,其中32名患者(91%)复诊时咳嗽压力试验仍为阳性。15名患者初次咳嗽压力试验为阴性,这15名患者中有13名(87%)复诊时咳嗽压力试验仍为阴性。所有20名被诊断为单纯性真性压力性尿失禁的患者初次和复诊时咳嗽压力试验均为阳性。在15名被诊断为逼尿肌不稳定或感觉性尿急失禁的患者中,13名(86%)初次和复诊时咳嗽压力试验均为阴性。在15名被诊断为混合性尿失禁的患者中,12名(80%)初次和复诊时咳嗽压力试验均为阳性。

结论

咳嗽压力试验似乎是一项可靠的试验。对于诊断为单纯性真性压力性尿失禁的女性,其可靠性更为一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验