Parker-Autry Candace Y, Barber Matthew D, Kenton Kimberly, Richter Holly E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jan;24(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1908-7. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Over 10 years have passed since the first US National Institutes of Health consensus panel considered the standardization of definitions of pelvic floor conditions and the criteria utilized for reporting pelvic floor research study outcomes. The literature is replete with pelvic floor outcome studies; however, a consistent standardized approach to the evaluation of patients and characterization of outcomes is still needed. The purpose of this overview is to describe how the use of outcome measures has evolved over time and to attempt to help readers utilize the best measures for their clinical and research needs.
自美国国立卫生研究院首个共识小组考虑盆底疾病定义的标准化以及用于报告盆底研究结果的标准以来，已经过去了10多年。盆底结果研究的文献很多；然而，仍然需要一种一致的标准化方法来评估患者和描述结果。本综述的目的是描述结果测量的使用如何随着时间的推移而演变，并试图帮助读者根据其临床和研究需求采用最佳测量方法。
