Pessotto R, Santini F, Pugliese P, Montalbano G, Luciani G B, Faggian G, Bertolini P, Mazzucco A
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, Italy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):2010-3; discussion 2014-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00417-8.
The aim of the present study was to verify the efficacy of preserving the aortic valve in patients with acute type A aortic dissection complicated by significant aortic regurgitation.
From January 1979 to December 1996, 178 patients (125 males; mean age 57 +/- 9 years) underwent emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, with an overall operative mortality rate of 21%. Based on a retrospective analysis of the preoperative angio- or echocardiographic findings, the 141 survivors were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (G1) included 80 patients (57%) with no or mild aortic regurgitation, and Group 2 (G2) the remaining 61 patients with moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. The native aortic valve was preserved by means of a uniform technique consisting of reconstruction of the aortic root and sinotubular junction in 99 patients (70%) [68 in G1 (85%) and 31 in G2 (51%)]. Forty-two patients required aortic valve (8 patients; 6%) or total root replacement (34 patients; 24%).
At a mean follow-up of 4 +/- 3.6 years (range, 6 months to 19 years), 19 of the 99 patients with a preserved aortic valve developed moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency [19%; 7/68 in G1 (10%) and 12/31 in G2 (39%)]. Multivariate analysis revealed that moderate-to-severe preoperative aortic valve insufficiency was a significant risk factor for development of postoperative aortic valve regurgitation (p = 0.008). Reoperation was necessary in 7 G1 patients (10%) and in 8 G2 patients (26%), with an actuarial freedom from reoperation at 5 and 10 years of 93% +/- 7% and 80% +/- 9% in G1 patients, and 81% +/- 8% and 40% +/- 15% in G2 patients (p = 0.045).
Preservation of the aortic valve and aortic root is recommended in patients with acute type A aortic dissection and absent or mild aortic insufficiency. Patients presenting with moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation and treated conservatively present an increased risk of recurrent valvular insufficiency.
本研究的目的是验证在急性A型主动脉夹层合并严重主动脉瓣关闭不全患者中保留主动脉瓣的疗效。
1979年1月至1996年12月,178例患者(125例男性;平均年龄57±9岁)接受了急性A型主动脉夹层急诊手术,总体手术死亡率为21%。基于对术前血管造影或超声心动图检查结果的回顾性分析,141例幸存者被分为2组:第1组(G1)包括80例(57%)无或轻度主动脉瓣关闭不全的患者,第2组(G2)为其余61例中重度主动脉瓣关闭不全的患者。采用一种统一技术保留自体主动脉瓣,该技术包括重建主动脉根部和窦管交界,共99例患者(70%)[G1组68例(85%),G2组31例(51%)]。42例患者需要进行主动脉瓣置换(8例;6%)或全根部置换(34例;24%)。
平均随访4±3.6年(范围6个月至19年),99例保留主动脉瓣的患者中有19例出现中重度主动脉瓣关闭不全[19%;G1组7/68例(10%),G2组12/31例(39%)]。多因素分析显示,术前中重度主动脉瓣关闭不全是术后主动脉瓣反流发生的显著危险因素(p = 0.008)。G1组7例患者(10%)和G2组8例患者(26%)需要再次手术,G1组患者5年和10年的再次手术无事件生存率分别为93%±7%和80%±9%,G2组患者分别为81%±8%和40%±15%(p = 0.045)。
对于急性A型主动脉夹层且无或轻度主动脉瓣关闭不全的患者,建议保留主动脉瓣和主动脉根部。中重度主动脉瓣关闭不全且接受保守治疗的患者,瓣膜反流复发风险增加。