• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性A型主动脉夹层升主动脉置换术后主动脉瓣功能的演变

Evolution of Native Aortic Valve Function following Ascending Aorta Replacement for Acute Type A Dissection.

作者信息

Everaert Nicolas, Bové Thierry, Claus Isabelle, Czapla Jens, Martens Thomas, Philipsen Tine, François Katrien

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Aorta (Stamford). 2025 Feb;13(1):14-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809171. Epub 2025 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809171
PMID:40527478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202026/
Abstract

This study investigates the evolution of aortic valve function following supracoronary ascending aorta replacement (SCR) for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Factors contributing to aortic valve stability and progression of aortic valve insufficiency (AI) were examined.Patients who survived SCR for ATAAD between 2000 and 2021 were included. Univariable analyses to identify risk factors for AI grade ≥ 2 were performed, including anatomical parameters, perioperative findings, and follow-up root diameters. Evolution of aortic root dimensions was also investigated.Seventy-eight patients were included. AI grade ≥ 2 was observed in 20 (29.4%) patients during follow-up. Cumulative incidence of AI grade ≥ 2 was 4.7 ± 2.2%, 7.9 ± 3.4%, and 15.1 ± 5.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Aortic root reoperation was performed in three patients (4.0%) within 3 years of the index operation. Significant predictors of AI grade ≥ 2 included preoperative AI grade ≥2 ( = 0.037, odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-2.09) and significant preoperative AI grade ≥ 2 in presence of at least two dissected sinuses ( = 0.039, OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.05-7.89). Diameters of the sinus of Valsalva ( < 0.001), sinotubular junction ( < 0.001), and ascending aorta graft ( < 0.001) increased over time. Absence of sinus of Valsalva ≥ 45 mm was 90.9, 84.9, and 80.3% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively.Preserving the aortic valve after ATAAD offers a viable long-term surgical option with a low need for proximal root reoperations in patients without aortic root dilatation. Significant preoperative AI, particularly in presence of extensive root dissection, are significant predictors of late AI grade ≥ 2, suggesting valve-sparing root replacement in these patients.

摘要

本研究调查了急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)患者行冠状动脉上升主动脉置换术(SCR)后主动脉瓣功能的演变。研究了影响主动脉瓣稳定性和主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)进展的因素。纳入了2000年至2021年间因ATAAD接受SCR且存活的患者。进行单因素分析以确定AI分级≥2的危险因素,包括解剖学参数、围手术期发现和随访时的根部直径。还研究了主动脉根部尺寸的演变。共纳入78例患者。随访期间,20例(29.4%)患者出现AI分级≥2。AI分级≥2的累积发生率在1年、5年和10年时分别为4.7±2.2%、7.9±3.4%和15.1±5.5%。3例患者(4.0%)在初次手术3年内接受了主动脉根部再次手术。AI分级≥2的显著预测因素包括术前AI分级≥2(P = 0.037,比值比[OR] 1.46,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02 - 2.09)以及在至少两个窦管交界区有明显解剖时术前AI分级≥2(P = 0.039,OR:2.88,95% CI:1.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/a97ac2a847f2/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/86de4121ea60/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/69094b886eff/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/a471a85ffca7/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/a97ac2a847f2/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/86de4121ea60/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/69094b886eff/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/a471a85ffca7/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27a/12202026/a97ac2a847f2/10-1055-s-0045-1809171-i240007-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of Native Aortic Valve Function following Ascending Aorta Replacement for Acute Type A Dissection.急性A型主动脉夹层升主动脉置换术后主动脉瓣功能的演变
Aorta (Stamford). 2025 Feb;13(1):14-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809171. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.升主动脉置换术与主动脉根部置换术治疗累及主动脉根部的A型主动脉夹层患者的比较
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17539447241303408. doi: 10.1177/17539447241303408.
3
Revisiting ascending aortic resection in the elective valve-sparing root replacement: assessing the benefits and necessity of hemiarch replacement at three centres†.重新审视择期保留瓣膜根部置换术中升主动脉切除术:评估三个中心半弓置换术的益处和必要性†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Feb 4;67(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf006.
4
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
5
Percutaneous Transcatheter Interventions for Aortic Insufficiency in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.连续血流左心室辅助装置患者主动脉瓣关闭不全的经皮导管介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
ASAIO J. 2017 Mar/Apr;63(2):117-122. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000447.
6
The diameter of sinotubular junction to body surface area is independently associated with incident acute type a aortic dissection.窦管交界至体表面积的直径与急性A型主动脉夹层的发生独立相关。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jun 18;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03502-x.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
8
Over Two Decades of Experience in Aortic Arch Reoperations: Long-Term Outcomes and Mortality Risk Factors.超过二十年的主动脉弓再次手术经验:长期结果及死亡风险因素。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 10;14(12):4087. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124087.
9
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
10
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.

本文引用的文献

1
Preservation of the Aortic Root During Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: An Effective Strategy?A型主动脉夹层手术中主动脉根部的保留:一种有效的策略?
Aorta (Stamford). 2021 Apr;9(2):67-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1725074. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
Fate of Preserved Aortic Root Following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair.急性A型主动脉夹层修复术后保留主动脉根部的转归。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Summer;34(2):419-427. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 9.
3
Type A acute aortic dissection with ≥40-mm aortic root: results of conservative and replacement strategies at long-term follow-up.
A型急性主动脉夹层伴≥40mm 主动脉根部:长期随访中保守和置换策略的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 8;59(5):1115-1122. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa456.
4
Recurrent aortic insufficiency after emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection with aortic root preservation.急性 A 型主动脉夹层主动脉根部保存术后急诊手术再次出现主动脉瓣关闭不全。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;161(6):1989-2000.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.116. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
The fate of residual aortic regurgitation after ascending aorta replacement in type A aortic dissection.A型主动脉夹层升主动脉置换术后残余主动脉瓣反流的转归。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Dec;160(6):1421-1430.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.118. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
6
The fate of aortic root and aortic regurgitation after supracoronary ascending aortic replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.急性 A 型主动脉夹层行升主动脉根部替换术后主动脉根部和主动脉瓣反流的转归。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):483-493.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.183. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
7
Reported outcomes after aortic valve resuspension for acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性A型主动脉夹层主动脉瓣再悬吊术后报告的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;29(3):331-338. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz080.
8
Durability and safety of David V valve-sparing root replacement in acute type A aortic dissection.David V 瓣膜保留型主动脉根部替换术治疗急性 A 型主动脉夹层的耐久性和安全性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;157(1):14-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.059. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Valve-sparing David I procedure in acute aortic type A dissection: a 20-year experience with more than 100 patients.急性主动脉 A 型夹层行保留瓣膜的 David I 手术:超过 100 例患者的 20 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):319-324. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx170.
10
Comparison of outcomes of root replacement procedures and supracoronary techniques for surgical repair of acute aortic dissection.急性主动脉夹层手术修复中根部置换术与冠状动脉上技术的疗效比较。
Can J Surg. 2017 Jun;60(3):198-204. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009116.