• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Frequency of problems during clinical molecular-genetic testing.

作者信息

Hofgärtner W T, Tait J F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Providence St Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jul;112(1):14-21. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/112.1.14.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/112.1.14
PMID:10396281
Abstract

Concerns have been raised about the quality of DNA-based genetic testing, but few data are available on the problems that occur during clinical genetic testing. We sought to determine the frequency and severity of such problems in US laboratories. Problems were defined as events that could or did impair patient care significantly. Data on the frequency and severity of adverse events during genetic testing were collected from laboratories by anonymous mail questionnaire and detailed on-site inspection. The surveyed laboratories (n = 42) reported significant problems in 0.33% of tests performed; the corresponding value in the inspected laboratories (n = 2) was 0.38%. Sixty percent of problems occurred in the pretest phase, 32% in the laboratory phase, and 8% in the posttest phase or multiple phases. The average level of actual harm resulting from these problems was low. Moderate or high levels of harm occurred in only 0.008% of total cases. No lawsuits, judgments, or disciplinary actions were taken against the laboratories in 277,000 tests performed. The overall frequency of problems in a given laboratory did not correlate with laboratory age, test volume, accreditation status, proficiency testing performance, or institution type (academic, private nonprofit, private for profit). In conclusion, significant problems during genetic testing occur infrequently (< 0.5% in most laboratories), and problems resulting in moderate or high levels of harm to patients are rare (0.008%).

摘要

相似文献

1
Frequency of problems during clinical molecular-genetic testing.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jul;112(1):14-21. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/112.1.14.
2
Are we failing in molecular genetic testing?我们在分子基因检测方面是否做得不够?
Am J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jul;112(1):11-3. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/112.1.11.
3
Quality assurance in molecular genetic testing laboratories.分子遗传学检测实验室的质量保证
JAMA. 1999 Mar 3;281(9):835-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.9.835.
4
Limitations of proficiency testing under CLIA '67.《1967年临床实验室改进修正案》下能力验证的局限性。
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1237-44; discussion 1245-50.
5
Interaction of genetic counselors with molecular genetic testing laboratories: implications for non-geneticist health care providers.遗传咨询师与分子遗传学检测实验室的互动:对非遗传学家医疗保健提供者的影响。
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Jun 15;119A(3):297-301. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20196.
6
Error identification in a high-volume clinical chemistry laboratory: Five-year experience.大容量临床化学实验室中的误差识别:五年经验
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Jul;75(4):296-300. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1010175. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
7
A practical guide for the validation of genetic tests.基因检测验证实用指南。
Genet Test. 1999;3(2):201-5. doi: 10.1089/gte.1999.3.201.
8
Proficiency testing in a medical-needs context.医疗需求背景下的能力验证。
Clin Chem. 1989 Mar;35(3):347-54.
9
Good laboratory practices for biochemical genetic testing and newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders.遗传代谢病生化遗传检测和新生儿筛查的良好实验室规范。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Apr 6;61(RR-2):1-44.
10
Errors, mistakes, blunders, outliers, or unacceptable results: how many?错误、失误、大错、异常值或不可接受的结果:有多少?
Clin Chem. 1997 Aug;43(8 Pt 1):1352-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-analytical phase errors constitute the vast majority of errors in clinical laboratory testing.分析前阶段误差在临床实验室检测误差中占绝大多数。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0190.
2
Frequency of Participation in External Quality Assessment Programs Focused on Rare Diseases: Belgian Guidelines for Human Genetics Centers.参与针对罕见病的外部质量评估项目的频率:比利时人类遗传学中心指南
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 12;9(7):e27980. doi: 10.2196/27980.
3
Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.
评估不同健康专业人员在分子基因检测质量实践继续教育活动中的学习体验。
Clin Lab Sci. 2016 Oct;29(4):200-211. doi: 10.29074/ascls.29.4.200.
4
The Effectiveness of Clinician Education on the Adequate Completion of Laboratory Test Request Forms at a Tertiary Hospital.临床医生培训对某三级医院实验室检查申请单填写完整性的效果评估
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):90-4. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.181834.
5
Feasibility of using microbeads with holographic barcodes to track DNA specimens in the clinical molecular laboratory.使用带有全息条码的微珠追踪临床分子实验室中 DNA 标本的可行性。
PeerJ. 2013 Jul 2;1:e91. doi: 10.7717/peerj.91. Print 2013.
6
Current landscape and new paradigms of proficiency testing and external quality assessment for molecular genetics.分子遗传学中能力验证和外部质量评估的现状和新范式。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Jul;137(7):983-8. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0311-RA.
7
Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process.管理总检测过程的分析前和分析后阶段。
Ann Lab Med. 2012 Jan;32(1):5-16. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
8
Quality standards and samples in genetic testing.遗传检测中的质量标准和样本。
J Clin Pathol. 2012 May;65(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200519. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
9
Clinical impact associated with corrected results in clinical microbiology testing.临床微生物学检测中校正结果相关的临床影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 May;43(5):2188-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2188-2193.2005.