• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析前阶段误差在临床实验室检测误差中占绝大多数。

Pre-analytical phase errors constitute the vast majority of errors in clinical laboratory testing.

作者信息

Lin Yanchun, Spies Nicholas C, Zohner Kimberly, McCoy Diane, Zaydman Mark A, Farnsworth Christopher W

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0190.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2025-0190
PMID:40311145
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Clinical laboratory errors pose a threat to patient safety and previous studies have demonstrated that pre-analytical error is the most common error type. Our study aimed to determine the types and frequency of errors occurring in clinical laboratory testing in contemporary practice.

METHODS

Errors occurring in a core laboratory between 01/2022 and 05/2023 were recorded retrospectively. Errors were quantified using multiple data-streams including real-time manual technologist intervention, incidence reports filed by hospital staff/physicians, and retrospective assessment using automated reports from the lab information system (LIS). Errors were adjudicated and binned into pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. Total test volumes were assessed in the LIS and electronic medical record.

RESULTS

There were 37,680,242 billable results reported from approximately 11,000,000 specimens during the study period. In total, 87,317 errors occurred impacting 0.23 % (2,300 ppm) of billable results and approximately 0.79 % (7,900 ppm) of specimens. Among these errors, 85,894 (98.4 %, 984,000 ppm) were in the pre-analytical, 451 (0.5 %, 5,000 ppm) were in the analytical, and 972 (1.1 %, 11,000 ppm) occurred in the post-analytical phase. Hemolysis impacting specimen integrity (60,748/87,317, 69.6 %, 696,000 ppm) was the most common error. When excluding hemolysis, there were 26,569 errors documented (0.06 %, 600 ppm of billable results), among which 94.6 %, 1.7 % (17,000 ppm) and 3.7 % (37,000 ppm) were in the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phase respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed error rates were consistent with previous studies with pre-analytical errors comprising most errors. High prevalence of pre-analytical errors implies a need for enhanced tools for error detection and mitigation in the pre-analytical phase of testing.

摘要

目的

临床实验室错误对患者安全构成威胁,以往研究表明分析前错误是最常见的错误类型。我们的研究旨在确定当代临床实验室检测中出现的错误类型和频率。

方法

回顾性记录2022年1月至2023年5月期间核心实验室发生的错误。使用多种数据流对错误进行量化,包括实时人工技术人员干预、医院工作人员/医生提交的事件报告以及使用实验室信息系统(LIS)的自动报告进行回顾性评估。对错误进行判定并分类到分析前、分析中和分析后阶段。在LIS和电子病历中评估总检测量。

结果

在研究期间,从大约1100万个标本中报告了37680242个可计费结果。总共发生了87317起错误,影响了0.23%(2300 ppm)的可计费结果和约0.79%(7900 ppm)的标本。在这些错误中,85894起(98.4%,984000 ppm)发生在分析前阶段,451起(0.5%,5000 ppm)发生在分析阶段,972起(1.1%,11000 ppm)发生在分析后阶段。影响标本完整性的溶血(60748/87317,69.6%,696000 ppm)是最常见的错误。排除溶血后,记录了26569起错误(0.06%,可计费结果的600 ppm),其中94.6%、1.7%(17000 ppm)和3.7%(37000 ppm)分别发生在分析前、分析中和分析后阶段。

结论

观察到的错误率与以往研究一致,分析前错误占大多数。分析前错误的高发生率意味着需要在检测的分析前阶段加强错误检测和缓解工具。

相似文献

1
Pre-analytical phase errors constitute the vast majority of errors in clinical laboratory testing.分析前阶段误差在临床实验室检测误差中占绝大多数。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0190.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
7
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020.暴力死亡监测 - 全国暴力死亡报告系统,2020 年,48 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 May 26;72(5):1-38. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7205a1.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Automating the Detection of IV Fluid Contamination Using Unsupervised Machine Learning.使用无监督机器学习自动检测静脉输液污染。
Clin Chem. 2024 Feb 7;70(2):444-452. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad207.
2
Contamination of clinical blood samples with crystalloid solutions: An experimental approach to derive multianalyte delta checks.晶体溶液对临床血液样本的污染:推导多分析物差异检查的实验方法。
Clin Chim Acta. 2023 Jan 1;538:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Average of Patient Deltas: Patient-Based Quality Control Utilizing the Mean Within-Patient Analyte Variation.
患者差值平均值:利用患者内分析物变异的均值进行基于患者的质量控制。
Clin Chem. 2021 Jul 6;67(7):1019-1029. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab057.
4
Addressing the identity crisis in healthcare: positive patient identification technology reduces wrong patient events.应对医疗保健领域的身份危机:积极的患者身份识别技术可减少错误患者事件。
Transfusion. 2019 Mar;59(3):899-902. doi: 10.1111/trf.15160.
5
Quality Control Practices for Chemistry and Immunochemistry in a Cohort of 21 Large Academic Medical Centers.21 家大型学术医学中心队列的化学和免疫化学质量控制实践。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Jul 3;150(2):96-104. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy033.
6
Laboratory-associated and diagnostic errors: a neglected link.实验室相关及诊断错误:一个被忽视的环节。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Jan 1;1(1):89-94. doi: 10.1515/dx-2013-0030.
7
The EFLM strategy for harmonization of the preanalytical phase.欧洲临床化学和实验室医学学会(EFLM)统一分析前阶段的策略。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Sep 25;56(10):1660-1666. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0277.
8
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.临床实验室检验质量指标:国际临床化学联合会工作组“检验误差及患者安全”项目进展状况。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):348-357. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0929.
9
Optimization of a Moving Averages Program Using a Simulated Annealing Algorithm: The Goal is to Monitor the Process Not the Patients.使用模拟退火算法优化移动平均值程序:目标是监控过程而不是患者。
Clin Chem. 2016 Oct;62(10):1361-71. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.257055. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
10
Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase.分析后阶段的性能标准和质量指标。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1169-76. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0897.