Stern M, Blondin-Ertzbischoff P, Murrieta-Aguttes M, Hardwicke C, Emmerson E B, Judd M S
Asthma and Allergy Research Unit, Leicester General Hospital, UK.
J Int Med Res. 1998 Dec;26(6):292-303. doi: 10.1177/030006059802600603.
This 28-day, double-blind, randomized study in 256 patients compared the efficacy and safety of mizolastine 10 mg daily with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. All four nasal symptoms (itch, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, obstruction) and three ocular symptoms (itch, tears, redness) were rated by investigators using both a 0-3 and a 0-9 rating scale. Compared with the placebo group total, nasal and ocular scores were all significantly lower in the mizolastine-treated patients at day 14 of the study (P = 0.0002-0.0009, using the 0-9 scale) and relief was maintained throughout the 4-week study duration. Patient diary total scores showed that mizolastine was effective from the first day of treatment. The 0-9 scale appears to be more sensitive than the 0-3 scale for rating symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
这项针对256名患者开展的为期28天的双盲随机研究,比较了每日服用10毫克咪唑斯汀与安慰剂对季节性变应性鼻结膜炎患者的疗效和安全性。研究人员使用0至3级和0至9级评分量表对所有四种鼻部症状(瘙痒、流涕、打喷嚏、鼻塞)和三种眼部症状(瘙痒、流泪、眼红)进行评分。与安慰剂组相比,在研究第14天时,接受咪唑斯汀治疗的患者的总体、鼻部和眼部评分均显著更低(使用0至9级量表,P = 0.0002 - 0.0009),并且在整个4周的研究期间症状缓解持续存在。患者日记总分显示,咪唑斯汀从治疗第一天起就有效。对于季节性变应性鼻炎症状的评分,0至9级量表似乎比0至3级量表更敏感。