Mallion J M, Baguet J P, Siché J P, Tremel F, De Gaudemaris R
Médecine Interne et Cardiologie, CHU de Grenoble, France.
J Hypertens. 1999 May;17(5):585-95. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917050-00001.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has now become an established clinical tool. It is appropriate to take stock and assess the situation of this technique. UPDATE ON EQUIPMENT: Important improvements in equipment have occurred, with reductions in weight, in awkwardness and in noisiness of the machines, better acceptability and tolerance by the patients, and better reliability. Validation programmes have been proposed and should be referred to. Limitations of the technique persist with intermittent recording in current practice. The reproducibility is limited in the short-term while recording over 24 h is acceptable. DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS: White-coat effect (WCE) is manifested as a transient elevation in blood pressure during the medical visit The frequency of this phenomenon, the size of the effect, age, sex and level of blood pressure (BP) or the situation of occurrence (general practitioner, specialist or nurse) have been interpreted differently. It does not seem that WCE predicts cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. White-coat hypertension (WCH) is diagnosed on the evidence of abnormal clinical measures of BP and normal ABPM. The latest upper limits of normality by ABPM recommended by the JNCVI are < 135/85 mmHg while patients are awake and < 120/75 mmHg while patients are asleep. If we accept these upper limits of normality in ABPM, WCH does not appear to be a real problem as regards risk factors or end-organ effects. In terms of prognosis, data are limited. Cardiovascular morbidity seems low in WCH but identical to that of hypertensive subjects in these studies. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results. WCH does not appear to benefit from anti-hypertensive treatment. It is obvious that the lower the BP regarded as the limit of normality, the less likely the occurrence of secondary effects of metabolism, or end-organ effects or complications in those classified as hypertensive. 24 HOUR CYCLE: One of the most specific characteristics of ABPM is the possibility of being able to discover modification or alteration of the 24 h cycle of BP. Non-dippers are classically defined as those who show a reduction in BP of less than 10/5 mmHg or 10% between the day (06.00-22.00 h) and the night, or an elevation in BP. In contrast, extreme dippers are those in whom the BP reduction is greater than 20%. CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM: The data remain inconclusive with regard to the existence of a consistent relationship between the lack of a nocturnal dip in blood pressure and target organ damage. As regards prognosis, it seems that an inversion of the day-night cycle is of pejorative significance. CEREBROVASCULAR SYSTEM: Almost all studies have shown that non-dippers had a significantly higher frequency of stroke than dippers. In contrast, too great a fall in nocturnal BP may be responsible for more marked cerebral ischaemia. RENAL SYSTEM: Non-dippers have a significantly elevated median urinary excretion of albumin. There is a significant correlation between the systolic BP and nocturnal diastolic BP, and urinary excretion of albumin. Various studies have confirmed the increased frequency of change in the 24 h cycle in hypertensive subjects at the stage of renal failure.
BP abnormalities should be considered as markers of an elevated risk in diabetic subjects but cannot be considered at present as predictive of the appearance of micro-albuminuria or other abnormalities. ABPM is thus of interest in type I or type II diabetes both in the initial assessment and in the follow-up and adaptation of treatment. PHARMACO-THERAPEUTIC USES: The introduction of ABPM has truly changed the means and possibilities of approach to the study of the effects of anti-hypertensive medications, with new possibilities of analysis such as trough-peak ratio smoothness index, etc.
动态血压监测(ABPM)现已成为一种成熟的临床工具。对这项技术进行总结和评估是恰当的。
设备有了重要改进,机器重量减轻、操作更简便、噪音更小,患者的接受度和耐受性更好,可靠性也更高。已经提出了验证方案,应予以参考。目前该技术在实际应用中仍存在间歇性记录的局限性。短期重复性有限,而24小时记录是可以接受的。
白大衣效应(WCE)表现为就诊期间血压短暂升高。这种现象的发生率、效应大小、年龄、性别、血压(BP)水平或发生情况(全科医生、专科医生或护士)的解读各不相同。WCE似乎并不能预测心血管疾病的发病率或死亡率。白大衣高血压(WCH)是根据临床血压测量异常而动态血压监测正常来诊断的。美国国立综合癌症网络(JNCVI)推荐的动态血压监测正常上限为清醒时<135/85 mmHg,睡眠时<120/75 mmHg。如果我们接受这些动态血压监测的正常上限,就风险因素或靶器官影响而言,WCH似乎并不是一个真正的问题。在预后方面,数据有限。WCH患者的心血管疾病发病率似乎较低,但在这些研究中与高血压患者相同。然而,需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。WCH似乎无法从抗高血压治疗中获益。显然,将血压视为正常上限越低,被归类为高血压患者出现代谢副作用、靶器官影响或并发症的可能性就越小。
24小时周期:动态血压监测最显著的特点之一是能够发现血压24小时周期的变化或改变。非勺型血压者通常定义为白天(06:00 - 22:00 h)与夜间血压下降小于10/5 mmHg或10%,或血压升高的人。相比之下,极端勺型血压者是指血压下降大于20%的人。
关于夜间血压下降缺失与靶器官损害之间是否存在一致关系的数据尚无定论。在预后方面,昼夜周期颠倒似乎具有不良意义。
几乎所有研究都表明,非勺型血压者中风的发生率明显高于勺型血压者。相比之下,夜间血压下降过大可能导致更明显的脑缺血。
非勺型血压者尿白蛋白排泄中位数显著升高。收缩压与夜间舒张压以及尿白蛋白排泄之间存在显著相关性。各种研究证实,高血压患者在肾衰竭阶段24小时周期变化的频率增加。
血压异常应被视为糖尿病患者风险升高的标志物,但目前不能认为其可预测微量白蛋白尿或其他异常的出现。因此,动态血压监测在1型或2型糖尿病的初始评估、随访及治疗调整中都具有重要意义。
动态血压监测的引入确实改变了研究抗高血压药物效果的方法和可能性,带来了诸如谷峰比、平滑指数等新的分析可能性。