März W, Wollschläger H, Klein G, Neiss A, Wehling M
Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jul 1;84(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00183-6.
Reduction in plasma lipids has been recognized as one of the primary cardiovascular risk reduction strategies in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). The primary end points of TARGET TANGIBLE were the safety (adverse events and laboratory measurements) and efficacy (responder rates) of therapy with atorvastatin versus simvastatin with the aim of achieving low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering to < or =100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/L). A total of 3,748 CHD patients with LDL cholesterol levels > or =130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/L) entered a run-in diet phase of 6 weeks without any lipid-lowering drug therapy. At the end of the diet phase, 2,856 patients met the lipid criteria and were randomized to active treatment for 14 weeks. Patients received 10 to 40 mg of either drug in an optional titration design at 2:1 randomization for atorvastatin versus simvastatin. Adverse event rates were statistically equivalent (p<0.01) for simvastatin (35.7%) and for atorvastatin patients (36.3%). Both drugs were well tolerated; <5% of patients in both groups were withdrawn due to adverse events. In all, 37 atorvastatin patients (2%) and 27 simvastatin patients (3%) had serious adverse events. Drug-related side effects (elevations in creatine kinase, liver enzymes) occurred in both groups at similar rates with 10 atorvastatin patients (0.5%) and 5 simvastatin patients (0.5%) presenting confirmed transaminase elevations >3 x the upper limit of the normal range. Significantly fewer patients in the atorvastatin group (n = 724) required titration to 40 mg compared with the simvastatin group (n = 514) (38% vs. 54%, respectively; p<0.001). Atorvastatin resulted in a significantly greater number of patients reaching the LDL cholesterol goal than those treated with simvastatin, with 67% of atorvastatin patients and 53% of simvastatin patients reaching the target LDL cholesterol level of < or =100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/L) (p<0.001). Both atorvastatin and simvastatin are safe for use by patients in the secondary prevention of CHD, with patients in both drug groups having similar adverse event rates. Despite the use of concomitant medications there was no drug-induced rhabdomyolysis with either atorvastatin or simvastatin.
降低血浆脂质已被公认为冠心病(CHD)二级预防中降低心血管疾病主要风险的策略之一。TARGET TANGIBLE研究的主要终点是阿托伐他汀与辛伐他汀治疗的安全性(不良事件和实验室指标)和有效性(达标率),目标是将低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇降至≤100mg/dl(2.6mmol/L)。共有3748例LDL胆固醇水平≥130mg/dl(3.4mmol/L)的CHD患者进入为期6周的饮食导入期,在此期间不进行任何降脂药物治疗。在饮食期结束时,2856例患者符合血脂标准,并被随机分配接受14周的积极治疗。患者按照2:1的随机分组比例,以可选的滴定设计接受10至40mg的两种药物之一治疗,即阿托伐他汀与辛伐他汀。辛伐他汀组(35.7%)和阿托伐他汀组(36.3%)的不良事件发生率在统计学上相当(p<0.01)。两种药物耐受性均良好;两组中因不良事件退出治疗的患者均<5%。总共有37例阿托伐他汀组患者(2%)和27例辛伐他汀组患者(3%)发生严重不良事件。两组中与药物相关的副作用(肌酸激酶、肝酶升高)发生率相似,10例阿托伐他汀组患者(0.5%)和5例辛伐他汀组患者(0.5%)出现转氨酶升高超过正常范围上限3倍的确诊病例。与辛伐他汀组(n = 514)相比,阿托伐他汀组(n = 724)中需要滴定至40mg的患者明显更少(分别为38%和54%;p<0.001)。与接受辛伐他汀治疗的患者相比,阿托伐他汀治疗使更多患者达到LDL胆固醇目标,67%的阿托伐他汀组患者和53%的辛伐他汀组患者达到目标LDL胆固醇水平≤100mg/dl(2.6mmol/L)(p<0.001)。阿托伐他汀和辛伐他汀用于CHD二级预防的患者均安全,两个药物组的患者不良事件发生率相似。尽管使用了伴随药物,但阿托伐他汀或辛伐他汀均未引起药物性横纹肌溶解。